Re: [MEXT] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mext-mip6-tls-01.txt

Fair enough. We will modify the statements in the I-D. Proposals below:

On 9/13/11 9:29 AM, "ext Julien Laganier" <julien.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

>I don' t think either of these statements are appropriate:
>
>- "The IPsec/IKEv2 based security architectures makes implementation
>and deployment of the protocol infeasible for numerous reasons."
>
>It has been implemented, thus it is factually incorrect to state that
>implementation is infeasible.

Just delete this statement.

>
>- "This document updates RFC 6275 and proposes an alternate security
>framework."
>
>No, it does not. This document is not on the standard track.

This document proposes an alternate security framework for Mobile IPv6 and
Dual-stack Mobile IPv6.

-Raj

>
>--julien
>
>On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 2:22 AM,  <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>>directories. This draft is a work item of the Mobility EXTensions for
>>IPv6 Working Group of the IETF.
>>
>>        Title           : Transport Layer Security-based Mobile IPv6
>>Security Framework for Mobile Node to Home Agent Communication
>>        Author(s)       : Jouni Korhonen
>>                          Basavaraj Patil
>>                          Hannes Tschofenig
>>                          Dirk Kroeselberg
>>        Filename        : draft-ietf-mext-mip6-tls-01.txt
>>        Pages           : 38
>>        Date            : 2011-09-13
>>
>>   RFC 6275 Mobile IPv6 signaling between the mobile node and home agent
>>   is secured using IPsec.  The security association between a mobile
>>   node and the home agent is established using IKEv1 or IKEv2.  The
>>   security model specified for Mobile IPv6, which relies on IKE/IPsec,
>>   requires interaction between the Mobile IPv6 protocol part of the IP
>>   stack and the IKE/IPsec part of the IP stack.  The IPsec/IKEv2 based
>>   security architectures makes implementation and deployment of the
>>   protocol infeasible for numerous reasons.  This document updates RFC
>>   6275 and proposes an alternate security framework, which relies on
>>   Transport Layer Security for establishing keying material and other
>>   bootstrapping parameters required to protect Mobile IPv6 signaling
>>   and data traffic between the mobile node and home agent.
>>
>>
>> A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mext-mip6-tls-01.txt
>>
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>
>> This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at:
>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mext-mip6-tls-01.txt
>> _______________________________________________
>> I-D-Announce mailing list
>> I-D-Announce@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
>> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
>> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
>>
>_______________________________________________
>MEXT mailing list
>MEXT@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext