Re: [MEXT] The first proposal for the DMM charter

<pierrick.seite@orange.com> Thu, 22 December 2011 09:44 UTC

Return-Path: <pierrick.seite@orange.com>
X-Original-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D67321F8B4A for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 01:44:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xjBF1u7nI638 for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 01:44:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from r-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (r-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com [217.108.152.42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4414E21F8AF9 for <mext@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 01:44:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from r-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 774765D8858; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 10:44:57 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.192.128.46]) by r-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CE375D8857; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 10:44:57 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.56]) by ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 22 Dec 2011 10:44:57 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 10:44:56 +0100
Message-ID: <843DA8228A1BA74CA31FB4E111A5C462021AB086@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr>
In-Reply-To: <00748B2A-D48E-41E5-9101-20E4ECD8A263@gmail.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [MEXT] The first proposal for the DMM charter
Thread-Index: AczAeCdjv81ZnG5ETfK4i9yG/9oH1QAERT+Q
References: <mailman.109.1324411221.2603.mext@ietf.org><1324531526.16224.YahooMailNeo@web28212.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <00748B2A-D48E-41E5-9101-20E4ECD8A263@gmail.com>
From: <pierrick.seite@orange.com>
To: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>, <peer.azmat@yahoo.co.uk>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Dec 2011 09:44:57.0369 (UTC) FILETIME=[5D838090:01CCC08E]
Cc: mext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [MEXT] The first proposal for the DMM charter
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:44:59 -0000

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : mext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mext-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de
> jouni korhonen
> Envoyé : jeudi 22 décembre 2011 08:05
> À : Peer Azmat Shah
> Cc : mext@ietf.org
> Objet : Re: [MEXT] The first proposal for the DMM charter was Re:
> MEXTDigest, Vol 54, Issue 12
> 
> 
> On Dec 22, 2011, at 7:25 AM, Peer Azmat Shah wrote:
> >
> >
> > One thing more: when we talk about DMM, then it means that we have to
> make changes in the network (routers, gateways, access points, base
> stations) so that they can handle mobility in a combined effort, not
> relying on a single MAP. But in 2nd paragraph of charter, it is written
> "either host- or network-based" means that new solutions can be either
> network based or host based (E2E). How, a mobility solution that works
> in a distributed manner can be host based (E2E)? It will be a network
> based solution.
> 

I do not see the point. Why are you saying only network based solutions apply to DMM?

> Not necessarily. Say that a mobile node evaluates each time it moves
> whether there is a need to a) find a more suitable anchor for
> subsequent sessions or b) whether use CoA instead of HoA for new
> sessions. For that network based solution is not needed.
> 

I second Jouni. Moreover, a  basic of DMM is the distribution of mobility anchors. IMHO, this is independent of the location of the mobility client; this principle can be applied either to host based or network based mobility management.

Pierrick

> - Jouni
> 
> ps: please, do not change the subject.. it complicates following the
> thread.
> 
> 
> >
> > regards
> > ---------------
> >
> > Peer Azmat Shah
> >
> > 1.  Ph.D Fellow | Department of CIS | Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS,
> Malaysia | +60 14 345 6020
> > 2.  Lecturer | Department of CS | COMSATS University of Science &
> Technology, Pakistan | +92 321 582 2507
> >
> >
> 
> [snip]
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MEXT mailing list
> MEXT@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext