Re: [MEXT] draft-xia-mext-hioptv4-01 and draft-ietf-mip6-hiopt-17 comments
Tomasz Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com> Sat, 19 March 2011 16:45 UTC
Return-Path: <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id DE9333A692E for <mext@core3.amsl.com>;
Sat, 19 Mar 2011 09:45:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000,
BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3fMrl68sUpKQ for
<mext@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 09:45:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ey0-f172.google.com (mail-ey0-f172.google.com
[209.85.215.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E33AA3A6AB5 for
<mext@ietf.org>; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 09:45:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by eye13 with SMTP id 13so1404701eye.31 for <mext@ietf.org>;
Sat, 19 Mar 2011 09:47:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to
:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Sevh2ISxHIDSjtPd68A9Z81T9cOC/tyPKMG099fA9Q0=;
b=OIEow6EwAv2W5YUVQmnHFY1YGPmA+QTXGLOTHV6AGCVTzLiSurhsQ5DuPina3YC9LK
pEC1/tPGENb5pul49XducVmQaMWBy1JCSr59h/jDS4R9U9W6yTnYJxuNqgsNPhgTiK9Q
x0E7o8sVzXZNqY4s92WlsJho6wSnsQD5bT3+4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject
:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
b=Z7nVWK8G8CYnyuVBiMCPGiwe1y5OVr4/UACvDvvsIAuW5Uv/A2ZmsV73JmCh/SmPs7
SNvigmk84lY014Dpec4DGSccpFAvbIXZ8t4hishYB6w+Xaqjv7aK9TIcl6nw5TvtQyHQ
lebZBGe5dWo72o73kaq+IOISZDWWS/0QR2clY=
Received: by 10.14.37.76 with SMTP id x52mr466025eea.27.1300553235182;
Sat, 19 Mar 2011 09:47:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.100] (host-109-107-11-157.ip.jarsat.pl
[109.107.11.157]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id
q53sm705927eeh.4.2011.03.19.09.47.14 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Sat, 19 Mar 2011 09:47:14 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4D84DE12.1010702@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 17:47:14 +0100
From: Tomasz Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US;
rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya@ieee.org>
References: <4D8283DF.7030702@gmail.com>
<487502.30828.qm@web111405.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <487502.30828.qm@web111405.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Behcet Sarikaya <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com>, MEXT WG <mext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MEXT] draft-xia-mext-hioptv4-01 and draft-ietf-mip6-hiopt-17
comments
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>,
<mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>,
<mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 16:45:46 -0000
On 2011-03-18 21:48, Behcet Sarikaya wrote: > Hi Tomek, > Can you please confirm that > > RSOO defined in draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-relay-supplied-options-04 is for > DHCPv6 only. Yes. I confirm. > There's no need or intent to define similar option > for DHCPv4. I can't speak for the whole DHC WG. I haven't heard about such plans. Also, keep in mind that DHCPv4 uses completely different approach to relaying as compared to DHCPv6, so the usefulness of defining RSOO for DHCPv4 is somewhat questionable. Tomek
- [MEXT] draft-xia-mext-hioptv4-01 and draft-ietf-m… Tomasz Mrugalski
- Re: [MEXT] draft-xia-mext-hioptv4-01 and draft-ie… xiayangsong
- Re: [MEXT] draft-xia-mext-hioptv4-01 and draft-ie… Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [MEXT] draft-xia-mext-hioptv4-01 and draft-ie… Tomasz Mrugalski
- Re: [MEXT] draft-xia-mext-hioptv4-01 and draft-ie… Tomasz Mrugalski
- Re: [MEXT] draft-xia-mext-hioptv4-01 and draft-ie… xiayangsong