IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81

marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es> Thu, 07 July 2011 06:16 UTC

Return-Path: <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>
X-Original-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 764E321F87A7 for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 23:16:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.562
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.562 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0diXSIfjr9TJ for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 23:16:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp01.uc3m.es (smtp01.uc3m.es [163.117.176.131]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4313621F88D1 for <mext@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 23:16:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-uc3m-safe: yes
Received: from marcelo-bagnulos-macbook-pro-2.local (35.50.22.95.dynamic.jazztel.es [95.22.50.35]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp01.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C3C0BF8DF8 for <mext@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 08:16:05 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4E154F24.3090600@it.uc3m.es>
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 08:16:04 +0200
From: marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mext@ietf.org
References: <BANLkTi=4LZToqiMN7+dNu9LpFDT=FzHetw@mail.gmail.com> <4E093873.1050201@kddilabs.jp> <05C81A773E48DD49B181B04BA21A342A25B851A83A@HE113484.emea1.cds.t-internal.com> <CAE_dhju9phhpBdyUwUgGK576DTJKyM9BbsLV-cYyHd+RwNRvvw@mail.gmail.com> <4E142285.4080400@kddilabs.jp> <CAE_dhjvEzGgpn_e1rVp-8bjVDrXaGQtdo1doyid7nNkDpoQnJA@mail.gmail.com> <4E14FD81.4040002@kddilabs.jp>
In-Reply-To: <4E14FD81.4040002@kddilabs.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.0.0.3116-6.8.0.1017-18244.003
Subject: Re: [MEXT] [dmm] IETF-81
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 06:16:08 -0000

Hi,

below...

El 07/07/11 02:27, Hidetoshi Yokota escribió:
> Hi Julien,
>
> WG mailing list sometimes leads to a lengthy discussion, which creates 
> misunderstandings and frustration that could be avoided if it was 
> discussed in a F2F meeting.
i agree
please point out the lenghty discussion that ocurred in the mext ml 
since the last IETF meeting that deserves f2f time to clarify the 
misunderstanding that were generated.


> Urgency is one important aspect but mutual understanding is another 
> good aspect of F2F meeting. It is pity to miss such a precious 
> opportunity for nothing in spite of a couple of very interesting I-Ds 
> awaiting a good discussion...
>
Right, but having a meeting to discuss issues that people not care 
enough to even comment in the ml, seems like a waste of time

Regards, marcelo

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email