Re: [MEXT] FW: Agenda requests for Prague meeting

[Alexandru Petrescu <[e-mail]>]

Le 22/03/2011 17:41, [e-mail] a écrit :
>
> Alex,
>
>
> On 3/22/11 10:37 AM, "ext Alexandru Petrescu"
> <[e-mail]>  wrote:
>
>> Le 22/03/2011 15:52, marcelo bagnulo braun a écrit :
>>> so, you ave downgraded you statement of several itemS being non
>>> MIP related and all the DMM discussion being non MIP related to
>>> just one single agenda item...
>>
>> You asked one, I told one.
>>
>> Another is the 3rd item (HAC is not a Mobile IPv6 entity, TLS is
>> not a MIP6 Type Code, etc.)
>
> Over the past several meetings we have discussed the idea of creating
> alternate security frameworks for Mobile IPv6. The WG was rechartered
> subsequently. Please see the following in the charter: "The MEXT WG
> will also explore experimental alternative security mechanisms. " I-D
> draft-ietf-mext-mip6-tls-00.txt is a different security framework
> which uses HAC and TLS in its scope.

Raj, thank you for clarifications.  I have indeed missed that draft.

I wonder whether it requires some modification to some RFC3775 Mobile
IPv6 message?  I am asking because I doubt so, hence my doubt about MEXT
doing only Mobile IPv6 work.

Anyways, what is a Mobile IPv6 draft?

- mention Mobile IPv6 label?
- extend a Mobile IPv6 message?
- encapsulate unmodified BU into other headers?
- able to run unmodified Mobile IPv6 in the same box running other
   protocol?

By some definition some agenda items apply others don't, I think.

Alex

>
> -Raj
>
>