Re: [MEXT] automotive reqs WG item
<Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com> Mon, 07 November 2011 20:06 UTC
Return-Path: <Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7599C21F8472 for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 12:06:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.517
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.517 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.145, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1=0.227, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J5H5CdizUIQq for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 12:06:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mgw-sa01.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [147.243.1.47]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94DE521F846D for <mext@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 12:06:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vaebh106.NOE.Nokia.com (vaebh106.europe.nokia.com [10.160.244.32]) by mgw-sa01.nokia.com (Switch-3.4.4/Switch-3.4.4) with ESMTP id pA7K6FVT019377; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 22:06:16 +0200
Received: from smtp.mgd.nokia.com ([65.54.30.21]) by vaebh106.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 7 Nov 2011 22:06:11 +0200
Received: from 008-AM1MMR1-004.mgdnok.nokia.com (65.54.30.59) by 008-AM1MMR1-012.mgdnok.nokia.com (65.54.30.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.339.2; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 21:06:10 +0100
Received: from 008-AM1MPN1-071.mgdnok.nokia.com ([169.254.1.235]) by 008-AM1MMR1-004.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.59]) with mapi id 14.01.0339.002; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 21:06:10 +0100
From: Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com
To: karagian@cs.utwente.nl, thierry.ernst@inria.fr, mext@ietf.org
Thread-Topic: [MEXT] automotive reqs WG item
Thread-Index: AQHMnU+Nqxf5P6XWiE2/GoZVRFZNtJWhfwEA///RrQA=
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 20:06:09 +0000
Message-ID: <CADD9616.15355%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <FF1A9612A94D5C4A81ED7DE1039AB80F01B743@EXMBX04.ad.utwente.nl>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.13.0.110805
x-originating-ip: [172.19.59.33]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <ADD10500B1242745B14B0711F28C7808@nokia.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Nov 2011 20:06:11.0545 (UTC) FILETIME=[B210A490:01CC9D88]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Subject: Re: [MEXT] automotive reqs WG item
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 20:06:27 -0000
On 11/7/11 9:52 AM, "ext karagian@cs.utwente.nl" <karagian@cs.utwente.nl> wrote: >Hi all, > >I agree with Alex and Thierry on this issue! >Where is the best place at the IETF to discuss and work out automotive >requirements? Maybe it would be worthwhile to organize a BoF and consider the potential for a separate WG since the automotive requirements are not just mobility related. -Raj > >Best regards, >Georgios > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: mext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of >> Thierry Ernst >> Sent: maandag 7 november 2011 14:17 >> To: mext@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [MEXT] automotive reqs WG item >> >> >> Thanks Alex for raising this. >> >> My view on this is that the automotive industry has some needs that are >> partly related to NEMO RO, but not only related to NEMO. >> >> So, I would like to seek advice from our AD about where would be the >>best >> place at the IETF to discuss automotive requirements related to IPv6 ? >> >> Regarding the dratf itself, it is our intention to update it. >> >> Regards, >> Thierry >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 07/11/11 14:06, Alexandru Petrescu wrote: >> > Hello Jari, WG members, >> > >> > >> > Le 28/10/2011 14:08, Jari Arkko a écrit : >> >> All, >> >> >> >> We are making some changes to the working group. While we have >> >> successfully published a large number of specifications in recent >> >> years, recently it has been difficult to make progress in the group. >> >> The chairs and ADs have looked at the situation and we believe we >> >> need a new focus and a bit of new organization as well. We are >> >> terminating the working group and moving the one remaining active >> >> work item to a new working group, the "DMM" working group. Here's >> >> what is going to happen: >> >> >> >> o Jouni Korhonen and Julien Laganier will become the chairs of the >> >> group. >> >> >> >> o The group will meet in Taipei (there is a MEXT slot in the agenda). >> >> >> >> o The charter of the group will be changed to focus only on the >> >> distributed mobility effort. We should discuss the details of this >> >> charter change both on the list and in the meeting. The meeting >> >> agenda should reserve some time both for technical discussions as >> >> well as the charter discussion. >> >> >> >> o Once the discussion on the list and in the meeting has finished, we >> >> will rename the group to "DMM" and put the new charter in effect. >> >> >> >> o If there are any other specifications that people would like to >> >> publish beyond the distributed mobility work, we can offer to AD >> >> sponsor them to RFCs outside the new working group. >> > >> > I wonder what is the plan about >> > draft-ietf-mext-nemo-ro-automotive-req-02? "Automotive Industry >> > Requirements for NEMO Route Optimization" >> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mext-nemo-ro-automotive-req-02 >> > >> > I can see a number of options to move it forward, like for example: >> > - change in authorship, title. >> > - continue as part of new Charter (fulfill earlier objectives) or >> > sponsor separately per your offer. >> > - change in focus. >> > >> > What do you think? >> > >> > Alex >> > >> >> If there is some significant new activity, we can create new working >> >> groups for that. >> > >> > >> >> >> >> Comments and feedback and/or alternate suggestions on this plan are >> >> welcome. >> >> >> >> We would like to thank Marcelo for your many years of service in >> >> MEXT. We could not have completed all the work we did without your >> >> energy and push for high quality results. We would also like to thank >> >> Jouni for taking on this new challenge, and Julien for continuing the >> >> work in this space. >> >> >> >> Jari and Ralph >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ MEXT >> mailing list >> >> MEXT@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext >> >> >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > MEXT mailing list >> > MEXT@ietf.org >> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext > >_______________________________________________ >MEXT mailing list >MEXT@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Jari Arkko
- [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Jari Arkko
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Hui Deng
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Hesham Soliman
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Hui Deng
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Ryuji Wakikawa
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Jari Arkko
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Julien Laganier
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Jari Arkko
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Ryuji Wakikawa
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group pierrick.seite
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Thierry Ernst
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group jouni korhonen
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group jouni korhonen
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Hesham Soliman
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Pete McCann
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group jouni korhonen
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group pierrick.seite
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group jouni korhonen
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group pierrick.seite
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group liu dapeng
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Hesham Soliman
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Pete McCann
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group jouni korhonen
- Re: [MEXT] automotive reqs WG item (was: the futu… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [MEXT] automotive reqs WG item Thierry Ernst
- Re: [MEXT] automotive reqs WG item Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group pierrick.seite
- Re: [MEXT] automotive reqs WG item karagian
- Re: [MEXT] automotive reqs WG item Dirk.von-Hugo
- Re: [MEXT] automotive reqs WG item Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [MEXT] automotive reqs WG item Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Hidetoshi Yokota
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Hidetoshi Yokota
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group Hesham Soliman
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group liu dapeng
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group liu dapeng
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group jouni korhonen
- Re: [MEXT] the future of the MEXT working group h chan