Re: [MEXT] automotive reqs WG item

<Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com> Mon, 07 November 2011 20:06 UTC

Return-Path: <Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7599C21F8472 for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 12:06:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.517
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.517 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.145, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1=0.227, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J5H5CdizUIQq for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 12:06:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mgw-sa01.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [147.243.1.47]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94DE521F846D for <mext@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 12:06:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vaebh106.NOE.Nokia.com (vaebh106.europe.nokia.com [10.160.244.32]) by mgw-sa01.nokia.com (Switch-3.4.4/Switch-3.4.4) with ESMTP id pA7K6FVT019377; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 22:06:16 +0200
Received: from smtp.mgd.nokia.com ([65.54.30.21]) by vaebh106.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 7 Nov 2011 22:06:11 +0200
Received: from 008-AM1MMR1-004.mgdnok.nokia.com (65.54.30.59) by 008-AM1MMR1-012.mgdnok.nokia.com (65.54.30.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.339.2; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 21:06:10 +0100
Received: from 008-AM1MPN1-071.mgdnok.nokia.com ([169.254.1.235]) by 008-AM1MMR1-004.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.59]) with mapi id 14.01.0339.002; Mon, 7 Nov 2011 21:06:10 +0100
From: Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com
To: karagian@cs.utwente.nl, thierry.ernst@inria.fr, mext@ietf.org
Thread-Topic: [MEXT] automotive reqs WG item
Thread-Index: AQHMnU+Nqxf5P6XWiE2/GoZVRFZNtJWhfwEA///RrQA=
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 20:06:09 +0000
Message-ID: <CADD9616.15355%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <FF1A9612A94D5C4A81ED7DE1039AB80F01B743@EXMBX04.ad.utwente.nl>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.13.0.110805
x-originating-ip: [172.19.59.33]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <ADD10500B1242745B14B0711F28C7808@nokia.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Nov 2011 20:06:11.0545 (UTC) FILETIME=[B210A490:01CC9D88]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Subject: Re: [MEXT] automotive reqs WG item
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 20:06:27 -0000

On 11/7/11 9:52 AM, "ext karagian@cs.utwente.nl" <karagian@cs.utwente.nl>
wrote:

>Hi all,
>
>I agree with Alex and Thierry on this issue!
>Where is the best place at the IETF to discuss and work out automotive
>requirements?

Maybe it would be worthwhile to organize a BoF and consider the potential
for a separate WG since the automotive requirements are not just mobility
related.

-Raj

>
>Best regards,
>Georgios
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
>> Thierry Ernst
>> Sent: maandag 7 november 2011 14:17
>> To: mext@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [MEXT] automotive reqs WG item
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks Alex for raising this.
>> 
>> My view on this is that the automotive industry has some needs that are
>> partly related to NEMO RO, but not only related to NEMO.
>> 
>> So, I would like to seek advice from our AD about where would be the
>>best
>> place at the IETF to discuss automotive requirements related to IPv6 ?
>> 
>> Regarding the dratf itself, it is our intention to update it.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Thierry
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 07/11/11 14:06, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
>> > Hello Jari, WG members,
>> >
>> >
>> > Le 28/10/2011 14:08, Jari Arkko a écrit :
>> >> All,
>> >>
>> >> We are making some changes to the working group. While we have
>> >> successfully published a large number of specifications in recent
>> >> years, recently it has been difficult to make progress in the group.
>> >> The chairs and ADs have looked at the situation and we believe we
>> >> need a new focus and a bit of new organization as well. We are
>> >> terminating the working group and moving the one remaining active
>> >> work item to a new working group, the "DMM" working group. Here's
>> >> what is going to happen:
>> >>
>> >> o Jouni Korhonen and Julien Laganier will become the chairs of the
>> >> group.
>> >>
>> >> o The group will meet in Taipei (there is a MEXT slot in the agenda).
>> >>
>> >> o The charter of the group will be changed to focus only on the
>> >> distributed mobility effort. We should discuss the details of this
>> >> charter change both on the list and in the meeting. The meeting
>> >> agenda should reserve some time both for technical discussions as
>> >> well as the charter discussion.
>> >>
>> >> o Once the discussion on the list and in the meeting has finished, we
>> >> will rename the group to "DMM" and put the new charter in effect.
>> >>
>> >> o If there are any other specifications that people would like to
>> >> publish beyond the distributed mobility work, we can offer to AD
>> >> sponsor them to RFCs outside the new working group.
>> >
>> > I wonder what is the plan about
>> > draft-ietf-mext-nemo-ro-automotive-req-02? "Automotive Industry
>> > Requirements for NEMO Route Optimization"
>> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mext-nemo-ro-automotive-req-02
>> >
>> > I can see a number of options to move it forward, like for example:
>> > - change in authorship, title.
>> > - continue as part of new Charter (fulfill earlier objectives) or
>> >   sponsor separately per your offer.
>> > - change in focus.
>> >
>> > What do you think?
>> >
>> > Alex
>> >
>> >> If there is some significant new activity, we can create new working
>> >> groups for that.
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Comments and feedback and/or alternate suggestions on this plan are
>> >> welcome.
>> >>
>> >> We would like to thank Marcelo for your many years of service in
>> >> MEXT. We could not have completed all the work we did without your
>> >> energy and push for high quality results. We would also like to thank
>> >> Jouni for taking on this new challenge, and Julien for continuing the
>> >> work in this space.
>> >>
>> >> Jari and Ralph
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________ MEXT
>> mailing list
>> >> MEXT@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > MEXT mailing list
>> > MEXT@ietf.org
>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>
>_______________________________________________
>MEXT mailing list
>MEXT@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext