Re: [MEXT] RFC 6301
"Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> Wed, 05 October 2011 18:22 UTC
Return-Path: <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
X-Original-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 52BC211E80CC for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Wed, 5 Oct 2011 11:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.413
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.413 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.891,
BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS=2.077]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9PfgKVt8d2wf for
<mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 11:22:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slb-smtpout-01.boeing.com (slb-smtpout-01.boeing.com
[130.76.64.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 606AD11E80C5 for
<mext@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 11:22:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stl-av-01.boeing.com (stl-av-01.boeing.com [192.76.190.6]) by
slb-smtpout-01.ns.cs.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/8.14.4/SMTPOUT) with ESMTP id
p95IPL7Q004518 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256
verify=FAIL); Wed, 5 Oct 2011 11:25:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by stl-av-01.boeing.com
(8.14.4/8.14.4/DOWNSTREAM_RELAY) with SMTP id p95IPFLS014974;
Wed, 5 Oct 2011 13:25:20 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from XCH-NWHT-07.nw.nos.boeing.com (xch-nwht-07.nw.nos.boeing.com
[130.247.25.111]) by stl-av-01.boeing.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/UPSTREAM_RELAY) with
ESMTP id p95IP0EZ014346 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128
verify=OK); Wed, 5 Oct 2011 13:25:01 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from XCH-NW-01V.nw.nos.boeing.com ([130.247.64.120]) by
XCH-NWHT-07.nw.nos.boeing.com ([130.247.25.111]) with mapi;
Wed, 5 Oct 2011 11:25:00 -0700
From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
To: Ryuji Wakikawa <ryuji.wakikawa@gmail.com>,
"sarikaya@ieee.org" <sarikaya@ieee.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 11:24:59 -0700
Thread-Topic: [MEXT] RFC 6301
Thread-Index: Acx+DGy2lyV9yOXtSF6hJHRoC/dE/AFf2XYw
Message-ID: <E1829B60731D1740BB7A0626B4FAF0A65C77323010@XCH-NW-01V.nw.nos.boeing.com>
References: <CAC8QAcecmV4iOywuzK-Hm_ErJTNkNhcSU5_pkRjvDJe8AR=JJQ@mail.gmail.com>
<C1346BD6-DF63-40F9-B0B5-9FD6E5FAB5D8@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <C1346BD6-DF63-40F9-B0B5-9FD6E5FAB5D8@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "mext@ietf.org" <mext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MEXT] RFC 6301
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mext>,
<mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>,
<mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 18:22:21 -0000
The survey seems to have missed IRON (RFC6179), which along with its supporting technologies (VET, SEAL, AERO) comprehensively addresses the mobility solution space. Thanks - Fred > -----Original Message----- > From: mext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mext-bounces@ietf.org] On > Behalf Of Ryuji Wakikawa > Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 11:28 AM > To: sarikaya@ieee.org > Cc: mext@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [MEXT] RFC 6301 > > Hi Behcet > > Thanks for the message. I believe there are plenty of > potential issues MEXT group can solve... > > ryuji > > On 2011/09/27, at 14:59, Behcet Sarikaya wrote: > > > Hi all, > > Have you seen this recently issued RFC 6301? I suggest > taking a look at it. Good survey from way back 1991 to this > date, thanks to Ryuji. > > It covers protocols like LISP and GTP (yes, GTP) and raises > the issue of interworking such as between Mobile IP and HIP, > I would add Mobile IP and SIP mobility. > > > > Regards, > > > > Behcet > > > > _______________________________________________ > > MEXT mailing list > > MEXT@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext > > _______________________________________________ > MEXT mailing list > MEXT@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext >
- [MEXT] RFC 6301 Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [MEXT] RFC 6301 Ryuji Wakikawa
- Re: [MEXT] RFC 6301 Templin, Fred L
- Re: [MEXT] RFC 6301 Templin, Fred L