Re: [MEXT] IETF-81

Hidetoshi Yokota <yokota@kddilabs.jp> Tue, 28 June 2011 02:12 UTC

Return-Path: <yokota@kddilabs.jp>
X-Original-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A300A21F84CA for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 19:12:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.09 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TYzNH7u+ooXo for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 19:12:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mandala.kddilabs.jp (mandala.kddilabs.jp [192.26.91.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 216BE21F841F for <mext@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 19:12:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (mandala.kddilabs.jp [127.0.0.1]) by mandala.kddilabs.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 837FC174824D for <mext@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:12:25 +0900 (JST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at kddilabs.jp
Received: from mandala.kddilabs.jp ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mandala.kddilabs.jp [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tzY-l73rL+0m for <mext@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:12:04 +0900 (JST)
Received: from ultra.mip.kddilabs.jp (ultra.mip.kddilabs.jp [172.19.90.145]) by mandala.kddilabs.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A56417481FC for <mext@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:12:04 +0900 (JST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (yokotaiMac.mn.mip.kddilabs.jp [172.19.90.26]) by ultra.mip.kddilabs.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD0561B9AF for <mext@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:11:16 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <4E093873.1050201@kddilabs.jp>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:12:03 +0900
From: Hidetoshi Yokota <yokota@kddilabs.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mext@ietf.org
References: <BANLkTi=4LZToqiMN7+dNu9LpFDT=FzHetw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=4LZToqiMN7+dNu9LpFDT=FzHetw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [MEXT] IETF-81
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 02:12:47 -0000

Hi Julien and all,

Sorry for our late notice, but we just submitted the revised version of
"Home Agent Initiated Flow Binding for Mobile IPv6" and would like to
discuss it at the next IETF meeting. Since this topic hasn't got
consensus and requires an intensive discussion, a face to face meeting
will be needed.

Please take a look at the following I-D:

http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-yokota-mext-ha-init-flow-binding-00.txt

Thanks in advance for your support,
-- 
Hidetoshi

(2011/06/28 1:36), Julien Laganier wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> at this point we do not have anything on our plate that would require
> face to face discussion thus the MEXT WG will not meet in Quebec.
> 
> --julien&  marcelo
> _______________________________________________
> MEXT mailing list
> MEXT@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
> 
> 
>