Re: [MEXT] FW: Agenda requests for Prague meeting

marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es> Tue, 22 March 2011 14:05 UTC

Return-Path: <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>
X-Original-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AD2F28C0EC for <mext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 07:05:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uQto0eTczrkR for <mext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 07:04:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp01.uc3m.es (smtp01.uc3m.es [163.117.176.131]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1526B28C0D0 for <mext@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 07:04:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-uc3m-safe: yes
Received: from marcelo-bagnulos-macbook-pro-2.local (wlap005.it.uc3m.es [163.117.139.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp01.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD472BF5402 for <mext@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:06:30 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4D88ACE6.6030207@it.uc3m.es>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:06:30 +0100
From: marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; es-ES; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mext@ietf.org
References: <E1829B60731D1740BB7A0626B4FAF0A65C69021B3A@XCH-NW-01V.nw.nos.boeing.com> <4D7E64EE.5030302@it.uc3m.es> <4D860B93.4030602@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D860B93.4030602@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.0.0.3116-6.5.0.1024-18026.007
Subject: Re: [MEXT] FW: Agenda requests for Prague meeting
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 14:05:00 -0000

Please point exactly what item in the agenda is NOT about the Mobile IP 
protocol.


El 20/03/11 15:13, Alexandru Petrescu escribió:
> Marcelo, Hi,
>
> I have a doubt about the reasoning behind declining Fred's request of
> agenda item.
>
> The current agenda
> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/80/agenda/mext.txt
>
> contains items IMHO only remotely or very vaguely related to the Mobile
> IPv6 protocol per se.  Additionally, agenda's DMM core item has a
> discussion which does not seem to converge on the use of Mobile IPv6.
>
> In this sense, I am not sure the typical statements of MEXT doing _only_
> Mobile IPv6 stuff holds any longer, as I see it today.
>
> Fred's "IRON and MOBIKE" draft-templin-ironmike-00.txt is related to IKE
> which is related to Mobile IPv6 security.
>
> I am not trying to advertise Fred's draft particularly.  I am saying
> this because...
>
> I have the same agenda problem with similar work I do (RA-based routing)
> for mobility, i.e. boxes which may run Mobile IPv6 but need something
> else than Mobile IPv6 Type Codes.
>
> That is my doubt about MEXT activity and agenda planning, thanks.
>
> Alex
>
> Le 14/03/2011 19:56, marcelo bagnulo braun a écrit :
>> Hi Fred,
>>
>> This is outside the scope of the MEXT wg, which is limited to the the
>> Mobile IPv6 protocol. Hence, we decline your request.
>>
>> Regards, marcelo
>>
>>
>> El 14/03/11 18:57, Templin, Fred L escribió:
>>> Hi Marcelo (and Julien),
>>>
>>> In January, I posted several messages on a new approach to mobility
>>> management known as IRON:
>>>
>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext/current/msg04529.html
>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext/current/msg04535.html
>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext/current/msg04543.html
>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext/current/msg04546.html
>>>
>>> The base IRON architecture document has now been published as an
>>> experimental RFC of the IRTF Routing Research Group:
>>>
>>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6179.txt
>>>
>>> and the mechanisms and operational practices are documented in the
>>>  following active Internet drafts:
>>>
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-templin-intarea-vet
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-templin-intarea-seal
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-templin-ironmike-00
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-templin-iron-pm-00
>>>
>>> I'd like to get a 20min MEXT slot at IETF80 to present the
>>> approach. Please let me know if that works for you.
>>>
>>> Fred fred.l.templin@boeing.com
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message----- From: mext-bounces@ietf.org
>>>> [mailto:mext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of marcelo bagnulo
>>>> braun Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 8:32 AM To: mext Subject:
>>>> [MEXT] Agenda requests for Prague meeting
>>>>
>>>> Please send slot requests for the prague meeting to the chairs.
>>>> please note that we are meeting on friday.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________ MEXT mailing
>>>> list MEXT@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________ MEXT mailing list
>> MEXT@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MEXT mailing list
> MEXT@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>