[MEXT] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6276 (3078)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 05 January 2012 10:26 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1479C21F87E3 for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 02:26:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.412
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.412 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.188, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p6BBTcvGYRIE for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 02:26:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A844221F87D8 for <mext@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 02:26:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 4BFA8B1E003; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 02:24:05 -0800 (PST)
To: rdroms@cisco.com, pthubert@cisco.com, fdupont@isc.org, Wassim.Haddad@ericsson.com, cjbc@it.uc3m.es, rdroms.ietf@gmail.com, jari.arkko@piuha.net, julien.ietf@gmail.com, jouni.korhonen@nsn.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20120105102405.4BFA8B1E003@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 02:24:05 -0800 (PST)
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, mext@ietf.org, sofiane.imadali@cea.fr
Subject: [MEXT] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6276 (3078)
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 10:26:22 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6276,
"DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for Network Mobility (NEMO)".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6276&eid=3078

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Sofiane IMADALI <sofiane.imadali@cea.fr>;

Section: 3.2

Original Text
-------------
Figure 3: Signaling sequence for the case the home agent is at home


Corrected Text
--------------
Figure 3: Signaling sequence for the case the Mobile Router is at home

Notes
-----
The figure name is not corresponding to the section's name. In addition, the home agent is always at home.

Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC6276 (draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd-07)
--------------------------------------
Title               : DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for Network Mobility (NEMO)
Publication Date    : July 2011
Author(s)           : R. Droms, P. Thubert, F. Dupont, W. Haddad, C. Bernardos
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Mobility EXTensions for IPv6
Area                : Internet
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG