Re: [MEXT] Review of I-D draft-korhonen-mext-mip6-altsec-06
"Jan Zorz @ go6.si" <jan@go6.si> Thu, 20 January 2011 09:34 UTC
Return-Path: <jan@go6.si>
X-Original-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85D183A7214 for <mext@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 01:34:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DLidRwhbPcuy for <mext@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 01:33:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ipv6.go6.si (go6.si [212.44.108.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F2D53A7212 for <mext@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 01:33:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jan-mac.local (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:d422:1:1293:e9ff:fe07:182c]) (Authenticated sender: jan) by ipv6.go6.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC90A2378033; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 10:36:38 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4D380226.3020108@go6.si>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 10:36:38 +0100
From: "Jan Zorz @ go6.si" <jan@go6.si>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: jouni korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
References: <4D37F38A.4080602@go6.si> <B96E2661-6C08-46A1-9C3D-915D604DDF0B@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <B96E2661-6C08-46A1-9C3D-915D604DDF0B@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: mext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [MEXT] Review of I-D draft-korhonen-mext-mip6-altsec-06
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 09:34:00 -0000
On 1/20/11 10:31 AM, jouni korhonen wrote: >> - Route optimization is an important feature of Mobile IPv6. Hence >> this alternate security solution should explain how the route >> optimization signaling messages are secured. > > Currently the I-D scopes route optimization out. That is stated at > the very end of the document though. We have been thinking to add > route optimization support though. Jouni, hi. I think this is essential and *must* be in there. Of what use is all mobility stuff if there is no route optimization? I understand that mobile operators are a bit nervous about that, but this shouldn't be a reason not describing/defining route optimization in I-D and do it in implementation. Regards, Jan
- [MEXT] Review of I-D draft-korhonen-mext-mip6-alt… Jan Zorz @ go6.si
- Re: [MEXT] Review of I-D draft-korhonen-mext-mip6… jouni korhonen
- Re: [MEXT] Review of I-D draft-korhonen-mext-mip6… Jan Zorz @ go6.si
- Re: [MEXT] Review of I-D draft-korhonen-mext-mip6… Arnaud Ebalard
- Re: [MEXT] Review of I-D draft-korhonen-mext-mip6… Basavaraj.Patil