IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MEXT] [dmm] suggest charter item for distributed mobility work

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Fri, 18 February 2011 20:25 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F8753A6F18; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:25:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.58
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.58 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.019, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22A05yGZ3fGK; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:25:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CA2F3A6DF1; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:25:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 163CA2CC32; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:26:14 +0200 (EET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k+ai8yJskidM; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:26:13 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (unknown [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9229B2CC28; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:26:13 +0200 (EET)
Message-ID: <4D5ED5E5.3080905@piuha.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:26:13 +0200
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20101027)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <C95CE87E.D35B%sgundave@cisco.com> <4D388641.7060405@piuha.net> <AANLkTimu4+VHtRmEHfFP--xQiW2KkoQ1JmHOonCUrSSi@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinT1EEco1o+nyzad7k11dkzir8HtwMgVoNZxhQx@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikjJ5Pkte2MbV4GOo3tutfr8ehKx7NDUi2keh4z@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikjTq+_AgF-JTT+agyxNyRt0kVsoFG2yxZ3wvRu@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikjTq+_AgF-JTT+agyxNyRt0kVsoFG2yxZ3wvRu@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dmm@ietf.org, liu dapeng <maxpassion@gmail.com>, "mext@ietf.org" <mext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MEXT] [dmm] suggest charter item for distributed mobility work
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 20:25:41 -0000

I think the focus should be on determining how to use the existing 
protocols for optimal distribution. If you start from a gap analysis it 
would set the focus on finding some case where this isn't possible.

Jari

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email