Re: [MEXT] Well-known problem with authentication/etc. inwirelessnetworks

"Charles E. Perkins" <charliep@computer.org> Fri, 26 August 2011 20:11 UTC

Return-Path: <charliep@computer.org>
X-Original-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE9F21F8BFB for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 13:11:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hj0w+XP1V+AH for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 13:11:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.62]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C36F21F8BD8 for <mext@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 13:11:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [64.105.168.146] (helo=[10.1.100.70]) by elasmtp-dupuy.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <charliep@computer.org>) id 1Qx2lE-0004UN-R5; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 16:12:17 -0400
Message-ID: <4E57FDF3.9040904@computer.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 13:11:31 -0700
From: "Charles E. Perkins" <charliep@computer.org>
Organization: Wichorus Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <4E57E814.4020607@computer.org><CA7D5704.FADF%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com> <CAE_dhjvEBg+AH5cLazfeQRxBwj7Njenp_rFoLZ9Uw=Zs7WyO1Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAE_dhjvEBg+AH5cLazfeQRxBwj7Njenp_rFoLZ9Uw=Zs7WyO1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ELNK-Trace: 137d7d78656ed6919973fd6a8f21c4f2d780f4a490ca6956d5d4673fe7faad86ee99e09b77ce41a0d8458427cee8cc11350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 64.105.168.146
Cc: mext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [MEXT] Well-known problem with authentication/etc. inwirelessnetworks
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: charliep@computer.org
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 20:11:05 -0000

Hello Julien,


On 8/26/2011 1:00 PM, Julien Laganier wrote:

> In the latter (handover between 3GPP and non-3GPP), given that the
> source and target system are accessed by different radio systems, I do
> not see handover performance has a factor hampering the usability or
> desirability of the inter-system handover scheme in use.

It is definitely true that a handset with two different
radio interfaces, given proper infrastructure support and
software, can maintain excellent user experience as the
application session is maintained seamlessly while the handset
changes its care-of address to reflect its new point of
attachment to the Internet from a new radio interface.

Is this what you meant?

But the way in which authentication is carried out during
handovers has a crucial impact on the handover performance.
Do you not agree?

Regards,
Charlie P.