[MEXT] Energy consumption attacks
Pars Mutaf <pars.mutaf@gmail.com> Mon, 21 March 2011 09:42 UTC
Return-Path: <pars.mutaf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id C187F3A67E4 for <mext@core3.amsl.com>;
Mon, 21 Mar 2011 02:42:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s4Wa5YL2nlS1 for
<mext@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 02:42:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qy0-f179.google.com (mail-qy0-f179.google.com
[209.85.216.179]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D61033A67FF for
<mext@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 02:42:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qyk7 with SMTP id 7so4348259qyk.10 for <mext@ietf.org>;
Mon, 21 Mar 2011 02:43:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type; bh=OEY5i0ynkNjIvW+Mt4+3T9puz3bVhSE4MjMapHHv/5s=;
b=tNoI7jPnL+AsfOg7jOQj8qfujI7jAVYS5ZTerqWETbSewL0XqRAkWlLoXuJzkOL0MY
U4NaqfZ4zZ8xNCDUlrqKdR4lPBVC1fNIReMc9FM85sTGGhkmEfp52MTGWiM1QCUFnfUe
X2AADSX8dVCU1LuO4hjQJTVXUHGFMef5hJaSY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
b=RBklWMH6f7nI+x2YRzqE73PHF5WXciHFC0lfa1TeKeafcx6bJfnwjDhtu2zvyml4dS
1g3+mnF8QU9hab0sFYd+r2t9OxZpXlNm2rCUaRyfOl3A0Z5IvD0BxaH5yZXHh1HBGGly
RdKc5mzUdziQILZA9evHhssk7DGJnoVyS/paE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.217.134 with SMTP id hm6mr3030483qab.172.1300700637041;
Mon, 21 Mar 2011 02:43:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.67.13 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 02:43:57 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:43:57 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTikW+MfR_R4A+g2+o=BZDnsAoOmfLHNgiOm4Z_-n@mail.gmail.com>
From: Pars Mutaf <pars.mutaf@gmail.com>
To: mext@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf300faf7d6e15a0049efaf71d
Subject: [MEXT] Energy consumption attacks
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>,
<mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>,
<mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 09:42:25 -0000
Hello, I was wondering if solutions to energy consumption attacks on battery powered mobile hosts would be of interest to IETF Mobile IPv6 community. The attack consists of sending frequent request packets e.g. SIP INVITE or TCP SYN to a victim's home address. For example, experiments showed that the battery of a mobile phone with 802.11 access can be remotely consumed in 3 hours (full battery). Attacks on phones using an outdoor technology would result in more energy consumption because of the longer distance to the base station. The victim becomes unusable. Regards, Pars
- [MEXT] Energy consumption attacks Pars Mutaf
- Re: [MEXT] Energy consumption attacks Pars Mutaf
- Re: [MEXT] Energy consumption attacks QIU Ying
- Re: [MEXT] Energy consumption attacks Julien Laganier
- Re: [MEXT] Energy consumption attacks Pars Mutaf
- Re: [MEXT] Energy consumption attacks Pars Mutaf
- Re: [MEXT] Energy consumption attacks Pars Mutaf