[MEXT] RFC 6301
Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Tue, 27 September 2011 21:56 UTC
Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 8CE4621F8F1D for <mext@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 27 Sep 2011 14:56:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ypZWF88++3rp for
<mext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 14:56:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-f44.google.com (mail-yw0-f44.google.com
[209.85.213.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16EB221F8F1A for
<mext@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 14:56:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ywa6 with SMTP id 6so7191090ywa.31 for <mext@ietf.org>;
Tue, 27 Sep 2011 14:59:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=h3x+r4TGD94DDLa7BBI2gIYPuPys56RuxSXWm4t2Wlo=;
b=wTy/XKY6BR1pr6rlPTXwRnCTDsd0ssbH4vHUXx9Nwr9MA61NpAXDPQQTart+tysK6U
5k8KXgqVwC4KlSnZuBYmuzIjHeFfnEii4g8ld+W1RZRddbmJotIU6z9ZJ16es0lbh8fD
+LxJxaO6K7GMw21+p0Zl1xafrUYixTYIR5MoI=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.191.103 with SMTP id f67mr7492835yhn.16.1317160757407;
Tue, 27 Sep 2011 14:59:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.236.108.180 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 14:59:17 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:59:17 -0500
Message-ID: <CAC8QAcecmV4iOywuzK-Hm_ErJTNkNhcSU5_pkRjvDJe8AR=JJQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
To: mext@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf30434ba00eb17604adf363c6
Subject: [MEXT] RFC 6301
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mext>,
<mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>,
<mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 21:56:36 -0000
Hi all, Have you seen this recently issued RFC 6301? I suggest taking a look at it. Good survey from way back 1991 to this date, thanks to Ryuji. It covers protocols like LISP and GTP (yes, GTP) and raises the issue of interworking such as between Mobile IP and HIP, I would add Mobile IP and SIP mobility. Regards, Behcet
- [MEXT] RFC 6301 Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [MEXT] RFC 6301 Ryuji Wakikawa
- Re: [MEXT] RFC 6301 Templin, Fred L
- Re: [MEXT] RFC 6301 Templin, Fred L