Reply to A simpler idea for the missing O mapping?

Urs Eppenberger </c=CH/admd=ARCOM/prmd=SWITCH/o=switch/s=Eppenberger/@wally-gw.udev.cdc.com> Fri, 25 February 1994 19:37 UTC

X400-Received: by /c=us/admd=attmail/prmd=cdc/ ; Relayed ; 25 Feb 94 11:22:37 -0600
X400-Received: by /c=US/admd=/prmd=XNREN/ ; Relayed ; 25 Feb 94 17:23:17 Z
X400-Received: by /c=CH/admd=ARCOM/prmd=SWITCH/ ; Relayed ; 25 Feb 94 16:28:33 +0100
X400-Received: by mta MTAwally in /c=us/admd=attmail/prmd=cdc/ ; Relayed ; 25 Feb 94 11:15:49 +0600
X400-Received: by mta cdc.us in /c=us/admd=attmail/prmd=cdc/ ; Relayed ; 25 Feb 94 11:22:37 -0600
X400-MTS-Identifier: /c=CH/admd=ARCOM/prmd=SWITCH/ ; 940225162833
Content-Identifier: 4008
Content-Return: Allowed
X400-Content-Type: P2-1984 ( 2 )
Conversion: Allowed
Original-Encoded-Information-Types: IA5-Text
Priority: normal
Disclose-Recipients: Prohibited
Alternate-Recipient: Allowed
X400-Originator: /c=CH/admd=ARCOM/prmd=SWITCH/o=switch/s=Eppenberger/@wally-gw.udev.cdc.com
X400-Recipients: non-disclosure: ;
Message-Id: <4008*/c=CH/admd=ARCOM/prmd=SWITCH/o=switch/s=Eppenberger/@MHS>
Date: 25 Feb 94 16:28:33 +0100
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Urs Eppenberger </c=CH/admd=ARCOM/prmd=SWITCH/o=switch/s=Eppenberger/@wally-gw.udev.cdc.com>
To: mhs-ds@mercury.udev.cdc.com
Subject: Reply to A simpler idea for the missing O mapping?
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

I kind off like the placeholder idea.

Now if we use space, what's the difference if the
space means 'placeholder for empty field' or if the space
means 'prmd name of a crazy guy'? I think the result
would be the same.

If I'm not correct, then we should choose a placeholder
value, which can't be used in a Standard Attribute,
for example '%'. This would make everyting clear.

Urs.

Reply to A simpler idea for the missing O mapping? Urs Eppenberger
Reply to Reply to A simpler idea for the missing … Kevin E. Jordan