Reply to Applicability of routing policy to reports

"Kevin E. Jordan" <Kevin.E.Jordan@cdc.com> Fri, 01 July 1994 12:51 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02223; 1 Jul 94 8:51 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02215; 1 Jul 94 8:51 EDT
Received: from mercury91.udev.cdc.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05048; 1 Jul 94 8:51 EDT
Received: by mercury.udev.cdc.com; Fri, 1 Jul 94 07:51:39 -0500
X-From: kej@mercury.udev.cdc.com Fri Jul 1 07:51 CDT 1994
Received: from localhost by mercury.udev.cdc.com; Fri, 1 Jul 94 07:51:35 -0500
To: Steve Kille <S.Kille@isode.com>
cc: "Harald T. Alvestrand" <Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no>, mhs-ds@mercury.udev.cdc.com
Subject: Reply to Applicability of routing policy to reports
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 01 Jul 94 10:24:55 BST" <23622.773054695@glengoyne.isode.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 94 07:51:34 -0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "Kevin E. Jordan" <Kevin.E.Jordan@cdc.com>
Message-Id: <2e14115759dd002@mercury.udev.cdc.com>

> I agree with this analysis, and I assume that Kevin does (implicitly).   
> I will add some text to this effect, and also to clarify this area
> a little further.   

Yes, the analysis makes good sense.  I was coming to the same conclusion, so
Harald's opinion was good reinforcement for mine.  Based upon this agreement,
we went ahead and implemented it accordingly in our MTA.