Re: Reply to More on implications of 22.2

Marko Kaittola <moa@dante.org.uk> Wed, 06 July 1994 07:54 UTC

Message-Id: <9407060753.AA02450@dante.org.uk>
To: mhs-ds@mercury.udev.cdc.com
Cc: managers@nic.switch.ch
Subject: Re: Reply to More on implications of 22.2
In-Reply-To: Your message of "06 Jul 1994 08:51:59 +0200." <"14474 Wed Jul 6 08:52:18 1994"@chx400.switch.ch>
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 1994 08:53:11 +0100
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Marko Kaittola <moa@dante.org.uk>
content-length: 758

[I'm copying this to MailFLOW managers, as I'm proposing something that might 
be of interest to them.]

Hello all,

I agree with what Urs has said, but would like to pick up one more detail:

Urs Eppenberger writes:
>I think one of the problems of lacking envolvement of the MHS managers
>in hte MHS-DS work

To me the problem is (or actually was, since I'm no longer managing a big mail 
host :) that:

- I don't trust current X.500 infrastructure enough to let it to mess with my
  mail, and
- I don't trust a system I'm not managing to mess with my mail configuration.

Maybe these problems could be solved (at least partly) by teaching MTA 
managers. Maybe we could have a two-days tutorial on MHS-DS with the next 
MailFLOW managers meeting?

	- Marko

Reply to More on implications of 22.2 Urs Eppenberger
Re: Reply to More on implications of 22.2 Marko Kaittola