Re: Directory vs "X.500 Directory"

"Harald T. Alvestrand" <Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no> Sun, 31 July 1994 21:22 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05024; 31 Jul 94 17:22 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05020; 31 Jul 94 17:21 EDT
Received: from mercury91.udev.cdc.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09927; 31 Jul 94 17:21 EDT
Received: by mercury.udev.cdc.com; Sun, 31 Jul 94 16:20:49 -0500
X-From: Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no Sun Jul 31 16:20 CDT 1994
Received: from zeus.cdc.com by mercury.udev.cdc.com; Sun, 31 Jul 94 12:32:33 -0500
Received: from domen.uninett.no by zeus.cdc.com; Sun, 31 Jul 94 12:32:27 -0500
Received: from localhost by domen.uninett.no with SMTP (PP) id <04575-0@domen.uninett.no>; Sun, 31 Jul 1994 19:31:32 +0200
To: Steve Kille <S.Kille@isode.com>
cc: mhs-ds@mercury.udev.cdc.com
Subject: Re: Directory vs "X.500 Directory"
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 29 Jul 1994 12:01:49 BST." <25946.775479709@glengoyne.isode.com>
Content-type: Text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 1994 19:31:29 +0200
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "Harald T. Alvestrand" <Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no>
Message-Id: <2e3be02c6e8f002@zeus.cdc.com>

I agree. It does not harm in any way, and helps clarity in the IETF context.

                   Harald A