Re: routingInformation and routedUA

D.W.Chadwick@iti.salford.ac.uk Thu, 19 January 1995 13:21 UTC

Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: D.W.Chadwick@iti.salford.ac.uk
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 1995 13:02:00 -0000
To: mhs-ds@mercury.udev.cdc.com
Subject: Re: routingInformation and routedUA
Encoding: 36 TEXT
Message-Id: <2f1e6721211b002@cdsmail.cdc.com>

X-From: mhsmail@karl.wtk.suresnes.marben.fr Tue Jan 17 10:17 CST 1995
From: mhsmail@karl.wtk.suresnes.marben.fr (MHS Mail)
Message-Id: <9501171614.AA24310@karl.wtk.suresnes>
Subject: routingInformation and routedUA
To: mhs-ds@mercury.udev.cdc.com (MHSDS list)
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 95 17:14:42 MET
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
Content-Length: 847

Hi MHSDS members,

I am currently working on the MHSDS draft dated May 1995.
I have a question regarding the routingInformation and
routedUA object class definition. The attribute
nonDeliveryInformation is defined in both classes and the
routedUA is a sub class of the routingInformation object
class. Where is the mistake : should this attribute be defined
in routingInformation or only in routedUA object class.

You are not alone in this. The base standard also has the same mistake!
David
 Best
regards

Jean-Francois MAURY
X.400 Technical Manager
--
----------------------------------------------------------
X.400 Developpment Team                Marben Produit
                                       9-11 Rue Curie
                                       92150 SURESNES
Email : x400@wtk.suresnes.marben.fr
X400  : /C=FR/A=ATLAS/P=MARBEN/O=SURESNES/OU1=MXMS/S=MHSGROUP/
Fax   : 19 1 45 06 32 51
Tel   : 19 1 47 72 55 00

routingInformation and routedUA MHS Mail
Reply to routingInformation and routedUA Kevin Jordan
Re: routingInformation and routedUA D.W.Chadwick