Reply to Re: Ommitted components in the 1327 mapping
Michael Storz <michael.r.storz@lrz-muenchen.de> Thu, 10 March 1994 11:38 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01301; 10 Mar 94 6:38 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01297; 10 Mar 94 6:38 EST
Received: from [129.179.91.44] by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03810; 10 Mar 94 6:38 EST
Received: from mercury91.udev.cdc.com by sequoia.udev.cdc.com; Thu, 10 Mar 94 05:24:02 +0600
Received: by mercury.udev.cdc.com; Thu, 10 Mar 94 05:23:05 -0600
X-From: michael.r.storz@lrz-muenchen.de Thu Mar 10 05:23 CST 1994
Received: from cdsmail.cdc.com by mercury.udev.cdc.com; Thu, 10 Mar 94 05:23:03 -0600
Received: from cd1.lrz-muenchen.de by cdsmail.cdc.com id SMTP-0012d7f0311012503; Thu, 10 Mar 94 05:22:59 -0600
Received: by cd1.lrz-muenchen.de; Thu, 10 Mar 94 12:22:52 +0100
X400-Received: by /c=de/admd=d400/prmd=lrz-muenchen/ ; Relayed ; 10 Mar 94 11:20:11 Z
X400-Received: by mta MTALRZCD1 in /c=de/admd=d400/prmd=lrz-muenchen/ ; Relayed ; 10 Mar 94 12:22:51 +0100
X400-Received: by mta MTALRZVEE in /c=de/admd=d400/prmd=lrz-muenchen/ ; Relayed ; 10 Mar 94 11:20:11 Z
X400-MTS-Identifier: /c=de/admd=d400/prmd=lrz-muenchen/ ; 940310120146864-MTALRZVEE
Content-Identifier: 940310120146864-
Content-Return: Allowed
X400-Content-Type: P2-1984 ( 2 )
Conversion: Allowed
Original-Encoded-Information-Types: IA5-Text
Priority: normal
Disclose-Recipients: Prohibited
Alternate-Recipient: Prohibited
X400-Originator: michael.r.storz@lrz-muenchen.de
X400-Recipients: non-disclosure: ;
Message-Id: <940310120146864-MTALRZVEE*/c=de/admd=d400/prmd=lrz-muenchen/o=/ou=LRZ/s=Storz/g=Michael/i=R/@MHS>
In-Reply-To: <4026.763295777@glengoyn */c=de/admd=d400/prmd=com/o=isode/ou=glengoyne/s=763295777/g=4026/@MHS>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 1994 11:20:11 +0000
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Michael Storz <michael.r.storz@lrz-muenchen.de>
To: Return requested <mhs-ds@mercury.udev.cdc.com>
Subject: Reply to Re: Ommitted components in the 1327 mapping
> I think that the difference is important, and exactly analogous to 1327. > > Appendix F gives PRMD=@ etc..... > > This is ONLY for use in this mapping. In the user addresses, you > simply leave out the component. I think that the arguments for doing > this in 1327 apply exactly here. > > > Steve > The exact analogy to RFC 1327 Appendix F would be to use pRMDName=\40 and mHSOU=\40 for representing mapping information from X.400 to RFC 822 in the routing tree (@=\40 analogous to SPACE=\20) or with my example O$@.PRMD$@.ADMD$cdnnet.C$ca#cdnnet.ca# c=ca@aDMDName=cdnnet@pRMDName=\40@mHSOU=\40 Using NullComponent=prmd and NullComponent=o is more different to RFC 1327 than using a placeholder. Regards, Michael
- Reply to Re: Ommitted components in the 1327 mapp… Michael Storz