Re: A simpler idea for the missing O mapping?
Julian Onions <j.onions@nexor.co.uk> Fri, 25 February 1994 15:26 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05116;
25 Feb 94 10:26 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05112;
25 Feb 94 10:26 EST
Received: from mercury91.udev.cdc.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09280;
25 Feb 94 10:26 EST
Received: by mercury.udev.cdc.com; Fri, 25 Feb 94 09:26:40 -0600
X-From: j.onions@nexor.co.uk Fri Feb 25 09:26 CST 1994
Received: from zeus.cdc.com by mercury.udev.cdc.com;
Fri, 25 Feb 94 09:26:39 -0600
Received: from lancaster.nexor.co.uk by zeus.cdc.com;
Fri, 25 Feb 94 09:26:28 -0600
Received: from nexor.co.uk (actually tornado.nexor.co.uk)
by lancaster.nexor.co.uk with SMTP (PP);
Fri, 25 Feb 1994 15:25:04 +0000
To: Harald Alvestrand <Harald.Alvestrand@skarv.uninett.no>
cc: mhs-ds@mercury.udev.cdc.com
Subject: Re: A simpler idea for the missing O mapping?
In-reply-to: Your message of Fri,
25 Feb 1994 13:58:41 +0100. <2d6df6147353002@zeus.cdc.com>
X-Phone: +44 602 520580
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 1994 15:25:01 +0000
Message-ID: <22562.762189901@nexor.co.uk>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Julian Onions <j.onions@nexor.co.uk>
I can't say I fully understand this - before I make a fool of myself could you give a couple of examples of how this works with a couple of DN's. Julian.
- A simpler idea for the missing O mapping? Harald Alvestrand
- Reply to A simpler idea for the missing O mapping? Kevin E. Jordan
- Re: A simpler idea for the missing O mapping? Julian Onions