IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [AGENTS] BOF at IETF

Steve Coya <scoya@ietf.org> Fri, 15 November 1996 15:55 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa26724; 15 Nov 96 10:55 EST
Received: from ietf.org by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12453; 15 Nov 96 10:55 EST
Received: from ietf.org by ietf.org id aa26711; 15 Nov 96 10:55 EST
Received: from ietf.org by ietf.org id aa26704; 15 Nov 96 10:55 EST
To: John C Klensin <klensin@mail1.reston.mci.net>
cc: Einar Stefferud <stef@nma.com>, Tony Rutkowski <tony@netmagic.com>, iesg@ietf.org, mhtml@segate.sunet.se, fred@cisco.com, directorate@apps.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [AGENTS] BOF at IETF
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 15 Nov 1996 09:44:00 EST." <3.0b33.16.19961115092014.4e07450a@mail1.reston.mci.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 1996 10:55:10 -0500
Sender: iesg-request@ietf.org
From: Steve Coya <scoya@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <9611151055.aa26704@ietf.org>

John,

>> Oddly, Steve, while our conclusions are the same, we disagree on the
>> above.

Well, not soooo odd. It seems to happen a lot! :-).

In this instance, though, I don't disagree with any of your points.

My comment (The issue is simply that there is no room at the inn) was
in response to a note I received from some one (I forget who now) who
said it was an important topic. I didn't want an exchange on the pros
and cons of the bof when scheduling was a moot issue - guess I wasn't
successful, eh?


Steve

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email