IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [AGENTS] BOF at IETF

Jay@aol.com Tue, 19 November 1996 17:47 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa06252; 19 Nov 96 12:47 EST
Received: from ietf.org by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14168; 19 Nov 96 12:47 EST
Received: from ietf.org by ietf.org id aa06244; 19 Nov 96 12:47 EST
Received: from emout02.mx.aol.com by ietf.org id aa06238; 19 Nov 96 12:47 EST
Received: by emout02.mail.aol.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id MAA20119; Tue, 19 Nov 1996 12:45:54 -0500
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 1996 12:45:54 -0500
Sender: iesg-request@ietf.org
From: Jay@aol.com
Message-ID: <961119124553_1849590634@emout02.mail.aol.com>
To: Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no, stef@nma.com
cc: fred@cisco.com, klensin@mail1.reston.mci.net, scoya@ietf.org, tony@netmagic.com, iesg@ietf.org, mhtml@segate.sunet.se, directorate@apps.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [AGENTS] BOF at IETF

In a message dated 96-11-19 10:28:04 EST, Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no
writes:

> (Humor: If we have 2 implementations of the IETF standards process,
>  we can actually move that from BCP status onto the Standards Track,
>  something believed impossible for a process, because interoperation
>  could not be demonstrated when there was only one of them :-)

I just want to be the first one to take advantage of this opportunity to
shout "SCOPE!!!" at Harald for this discussion of a completely different
proposed RFC, which obviously belongs in its own BOF and not in MHTML.  Hey,
how often do you get to do that to Harald?  (grin, duck, run)

Jay Levitt
Manager, Mail Systems Development
AOL

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email