Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] Update to draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-mib-08

[Hiroshi Tsunoda <[e-mail]>]

Dear Glenn,

I am very glad to know that all issues are addressed.
Thank you very much for your elaborate review and advice.
I really appreciate it.

Best regards,

-- tsuno

2018-07-30 21:29 GMT+09:00 Glenn Mansfield Keeni <[e-mail]>:
> Dear Tsuno,
>      This draft is looking good. Thank you for the
> good work. I have no further issues with the document
> and the MIB. I believe the MIB review is complete.
>
> Thanks again for your cooperation during this rather
> long and tedious review.
>
> Glenn
>
>
> On 2018/07/30 19:39, Hiroshi Tsunoda wrote:
>>
>> Hi Glenn,
>>
>> I have submitted draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-mib-08.
>> Links to the draft and diff are as follows.
>>
>> URL:
>> https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-mib-08.txt
>> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-mib-08
>> Htmlized:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-mib
>> Diff:
>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-mib-08
>>
>> Please see some notes below.
>>
>>> 1. Delete the last paragraph of IANA considerations.
>>
>>
>> Done.
>>
>>> 2. Move
>>>       mvpnBgpCmcastRouteWithdrawalTimer,
>>>       mvpnBgpSrcSharedTreeJoinTimer,
>>>    from mvpnBgpGroup to mvpnScalarGroup
>>>    unless there is a good reason to keep those in mvpnBgpGroup
>>
>>
>> I have added new OBJECT-GROUP called mvpnBgpScalarGroup.
>> All BGP-specific scalar objects (see the list below) are in the group now.
>> This is for providing more appropriate compliance statements.
>>
>> - mvpnMldpMvrfs,
>> - mvpnBgpV4Mvrfs,
>> - mvpnBgpV6Mvrfs,
>> - mvpnBgpCmcastRouteWithdrawalTimer,
>> - mvpnBgpSrcSharedTreeJoinTimer
>>
>> I hope this version clears all of your requirements.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> -- tsuno
>>
>