RE: [midcom] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-midcom-mib-01.txt
"Christopher A. Martin" <chris@sip1.com> Fri, 14 May 2004 21:59 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (iesg.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA01089 for <midcom-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 14 May 2004 17:59:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BOkg0-0001jH-Fa for midcom-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 14 May 2004 17:57:08 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i4ELv8Vs006624 for midcom-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 14 May 2004 17:57:08 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BOkZB-0000Rj-AQ; Fri, 14 May 2004 17:50:05 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BOkSU-0007VA-Va for midcom@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 14 May 2004 17:43:11 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA29989 for <midcom@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 May 2004 17:43:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BOkSS-0002xf-F4 for midcom@ietf.org; Fri, 14 May 2004 17:43:08 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BOkRA-0002I6-00 for midcom@ietf.org; Fri, 14 May 2004 17:41:48 -0400
Received: from adsl-64-219-190-5.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net ([64.219.190.5] helo=voyager.sip1.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BOkPl-0000uz-00 for midcom@ietf.org; Fri, 14 May 2004 17:40:21 -0400
Received: from HOME2 (adsl-64-219-190-1.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net [64.219.190.1]) by voyager.sip1.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i4ELfi7f004829; Fri, 14 May 2004 16:41:44 -0500
Reply-To: Chris@sip1.com
From: "Christopher A. Martin" <chris@sip1.com>
To: j.schoenwaelder@iu-bremen.de
Cc: 'Melinda Shore' <mshore@cisco.com>, midcom@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [midcom] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-midcom-mib-01.txt
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 16:39:44 -0500
Organization: SIP1 Information Services
Message-ID: <00ba01c439fb$f979f370$6402a8c0@HOME2>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
In-Reply-To: <20040514202458.GA1793@iu-bremen.de>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: midcom-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: midcom-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: midcom@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/midcom>, <mailto:midcom-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <midcom.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:midcom@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:midcom-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/midcom>, <mailto:midcom-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I agree, just haven't seen many implementations of SNMP proxies. Is anyone aware of any generally available SNMPv3 proxies? _____ Christopher A. Martin P.O. Box 1264 Cedar Hill, Texas 75104 _____ DOMAINS.SIP1.COM Select your option below by clicking on the icon. RegisterForwardDomainAlert MonitoringWeb HostingSite BuilderEmailTraffic Blazer & Quick SizzleSSLInternet UtilitiesCopyright -----Original Message----- From: midcom-admin@ietf.org [mailto:midcom-admin@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Juergen Schoenwaelder Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 3:25 PM To: Christopher A. Martin Cc: 'Melinda Shore'; midcom@ietf.org Subject: Re: [midcom] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-midcom-mib-01.txt On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 09:39:16PM -0500, Christopher A. Martin wrote: > Just a thought...SNMP has always been the sore spot when it comes to > managing devices behind a nat. Before snmp v3 I would never have asked > rfor such functionality, but now... See RFC 2962 for a discussion why the proper way to handle NATs is the usage of SNMPv3 proxies. Note: I am not saying it is easy - just that it is possible. ;-) /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder International University Bremen <http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/> P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany _______________________________________________ midcom mailing list midcom@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/midcom _______________________________________________ midcom mailing list midcom@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/midcom
- [midcom] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-midcom-mib-01.txt Internet-Drafts
- Fwd: [midcom] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-midcom-mib-01… Melinda Shore
- RE: [midcom] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-midcom-mib-01.… Medhavi Bhatia
- RE: [midcom] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-midcom-mib-01.… Christopher A. Martin
- RE: [midcom] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-midcom-mib-01.… Martin Stiemerling
- RE: [midcom] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-midcom-mib-01.… Harrington, David
- Re: [midcom] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-midcom-mib-01.… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- RE: [midcom] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-midcom-mib-01.… Christopher A. Martin
- RE: [midcom] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-midcom-mib-01.… Christopher A. Martin