Re: [midcom] Available for MIDCOM discussions in Paris

Sebastian Kiesel <kiesel@ikr.uni-stuttgart.de> Mon, 01 August 2005 16:26 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Dzd7w-00085l-0p; Mon, 01 Aug 2005 12:26:56 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Dzd7u-00084q-51 for midcom@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2005 12:26:54 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA22086 for <midcom@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 12:26:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from wall.ikr.uni-stuttgart.de ([129.69.170.1]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DzdeB-0000vZ-Bq for midcom@ietf.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2005 13:00:17 -0400
Received: from netsrv1.ikr.uni-stuttgart.de (netsrv1-c [10.11.12.12]) by wall.ikr.uni-stuttgart.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2DEA56D31; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 18:26:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by netsrv1.ikr.uni-stuttgart.de (Postfix, from userid 539) id 95451BD604; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 18:26:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ikr.uni-stuttgart.de (lnc6 [10.21.12.26]) by netsrv1.ikr.uni-stuttgart.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D3C0BD602; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 18:26:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by ikr.uni-stuttgart.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 1 Aug 2005 18:26:29 +0200
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 18:26:29 +0200
From: Sebastian Kiesel <kiesel@ikr.uni-stuttgart.de>
To: Juergen Quittek <quittek@netlab.nec.de>
Subject: Re: [midcom] Available for MIDCOM discussions in Paris
Message-ID: <20050801182629.D14540@ikr.uni-stuttgart.de>
References: <CA06DEC5CFE723D0FA6BB07E@open-31-49.ietf63.ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <CA06DEC5CFE723D0FA6BB07E@open-31-49.ietf63.ietf.org>; from quittek@netlab.nec.de on Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 05:45:04PM +0200
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on netsrv1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 8b431ad66d60be2d47c7bfeb879db82c
Cc: "'midcom@ietf.org'" <midcom@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: midcom@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: midcom.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/midcom>, <mailto:midcom-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:midcom@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:midcom-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/midcom>, <mailto:midcom-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: midcom-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: midcom-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Rick,

On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 05:45:04PM +0200, Juergen Quittek wrote:
> Hi Rick,
> 
> --On 8/1/2005 8:52 AM -0400 Townsend, Richard L, JR (Rick) wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> > Some of you may recall that I introduced a draft to MIDCOM
> > entitled <draft-stott-behave-safenet-00>.  I just spoke with Allison
> > and she suggested that SAFENeT might be one of the several drafts on
> > protocols for traversing NAT/FWs that could go forward as Experimental
> > documents since it does address specific concerns for enterprise
> > environments.
> 
> I think I asked this before: Reading your draft, I have not seen any
> technical feature of SAFENeT in your draft that is specific for enterprise
> environments.
> 
> All scenarios you describe are fully matched by the MIDCOM semantics
> and MIDCOM MIB.
> 
> Would you explain which TECHNICAL feature of SAFENeT you see that
> do "address specific concerns for enterprise environments"?

Or, if you believe that SAFENeT is better suited for enterprise 
environments because it is a "lightweight MIDCOM" and therefore
easier to implement or to deploy, please state which requirements
of MIDCOM (that cause a substantial effort) are not needed 
with SAFENeT?

> > Because MIDCOM is not meeting here in Paris,
> > I want to make myself available in Paris during the meeting for
> > off-line discussion on the pros and cons of SAFENeT and on how
> > to proceed forward with a SAFENeT draft.  Comments are welcome.
> 
> When would you be available for a discussion?

I would be interested in a discussion, too. When?




Thanks,
Sebastian

-- 
Sebastian Kiesel                University of Stuttgart
Tel: +49 711 685 7992           Institute of Communication Networks and
Fax: +49 711 685 7983           Computer Engineering (IKR, formerly: IND)
kiesel@ikr.uni-stuttgart.de     Pfaffenwaldring 47, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany

_______________________________________________
midcom mailing list
midcom@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/midcom