Re: [middisc] closure of the middisc list

Anantha Ramaiah <ananth@ntti3.com> Thu, 11 April 2013 16:43 UTC

Return-Path: <ananth@ntti3.com>
X-Original-To: middisc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: middisc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B3E321F8F28 for <middisc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:43:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WuP63bbIZEVd for <middisc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:43:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-f44.google.com (mail-wg0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C083321F85F3 for <middisc@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:43:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f44.google.com with SMTP id z11so1875249wgg.35 for <middisc@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:43:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=AJXyGtTJ9ODzTTuVmp5rjDsCC0zLLo3TQ5ztWZ6VUGc=; b=XAfwaRaKR3qFOXw/z++KMN7GLbdGZp7Rc9YKD8mnOVdTyYloWEh963d/aI5oP8zpG+ qO3NJv7NjRimtBR3yCQaKH3SuBYeadVbtpgDOQJ3pH/S5eGzaKmorGa7bESUWy//Cl08 UjmuI/xKH0h5JXKAfWBJ7wGCikQUvzOYTVq22yv61b3f/OP4a0THkwLgy2QbdwN2++KY 6Tl33UXrqISpniVrWmkka1jnSPX+yHQ0Ey+ed4jKeez/mUlNjGHyhXq7oBHs5/nhe5JV lEqZA8SID1jkyAnXcuUCOacuMY7olIZo/orghfmjcTrYPfiHk+kgZytav5r4VfW0+3dZ Ub0w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.13.34 with SMTP id e2mr12241874wic.29.1365698598995; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:43:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.8.38 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:43:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAFZUbhdnYjfVUrPfwis0a6bnfYzUbsotOu6KYZ5n_9mosXMTew@mail.gmail.com>
References: <50ECC3EF.1020405@mti-systems.com> <CAFZUbhfVGwZQLA+cn_MKoM1GLHBddxGTnOfwtksPWs4+P2p0hg@mail.gmail.com> <CD6E74FCC0FE024BB73C6B483F6706FE0FC0FCD3@xmb-rcd-x07.cisco.com> <D4D47BCFFE5A004F95D707546AC0D7E91F5D2AA9@SACEXCMBX06-PRD.hq.netapp.com> <D22144CF-6E2B-40F0-9DF1-8EF551B93D17@cisco.com> <510B1D7B.1080704@mti-systems.com> <DF29671EFBFC454E984F5A1AD4834F491E79F54E@pwsvl-excmbx-04.internal.cacheflow.com> <510B265E.6060003@mti-systems.com> <CD6E74FCC0FE024BB73C6B483F6706FE0FC60D2F@xmb-rcd-x07.cisco.com> <CD6E74FCC0FE024BB73C6B483F6706FE0FC62DB3@xmb-rcd-x07.cisco.com> <974FE049BD0F2E4188567FAD99DEF0331E801629@pwsvl-excmbx-04.internal.cacheflow.com> <512AD48A.5010104@mti-systems.com> <CAFZUbhdnYjfVUrPfwis0a6bnfYzUbsotOu6KYZ5n_9mosXMTew@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:43:18 -0700
Message-ID: <CAFZUbhe9tUy7+pyfQsgJDLQRq5_hmf8NxaY3juNFGODwJKz-Hw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Anantha Ramaiah <ananth@ntti3.com>
To: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2a85add0e2404da187b7d
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm7jKcn4cxEFU/3VVyk9QpXSlGB1cDlkZ8GhlsJbZTkwttxog4xfLzLdJcwaWQNlcLlu/fO
Cc: "middisc@ietf.org" <middisc@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [middisc] closure of the middisc list
X-BeenThere: middisc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions on TCP option for middlebox discovery." <middisc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/middisc>, <mailto:middisc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/middisc>
List-Post: <mailto:middisc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:middisc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/middisc>, <mailto:middisc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:44:12 -0000

Hi Wes,

Curious, what is the current status on this?

-Anantha



>
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>; wrote:
>
>> On 2/23/2013 5:50 PM, Knutsen, Andrew wrote:
>> >
>> >    What is the next step for this?  I think we've reached consensus...
>>  Do we have an option to publish as more than a draft?
>> >
>>
>>
>> Just to clarify my last email, "AD-sponsoring" it is a way to
>> get a Standards Track RFC without going through a Working Group,
>> if you have a supportive AD.  I think after my term is up next
>> month, that Martin might be willing to finish the job.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Wes Eddy
>> MTI Systems
>> _______________________________________________
>> middisc mailing list
>> middisc@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/middisc
>>
>
>