[mif] Concensus call on MPVD ID document
Hui Deng <denghui02@hotmail.com> Sun, 22 November 2015 11:22 UTC
Return-Path: <denghui02@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 752EC1B323D for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 03:22:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.933
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.933 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.585] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TzKGSX5GR_JQ for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 03:22:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from COL004-OMC2S16.hotmail.com (col004-omc2s16.hotmail.com [65.55.34.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 051401B3239 for <mif@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 03:22:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from COL125-W3 ([65.55.34.72]) by COL004-OMC2S16.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Sun, 22 Nov 2015 03:22:03 -0800
X-TMN: [HuNjHLb8XdMbQaJvQwSqRrPPjMUtLr340Z+hFmGLj/E=]
X-Originating-Email: [denghui02@hotmail.com]
Message-ID: <COL125-W313CE6E425B8FF193C9E7B1180@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_c08e860c-0d1f-4fb6-b35a-367f64b9d920_"
From: Hui Deng <denghui02@hotmail.com>
To: "mif@ietf.org" <mif@ietf.org>, Margaret Cullen <mrcullen42@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 19:22:03 +0800
Importance: Normal
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Nov 2015 11:22:03.0503 (UTC) FILETIME=[03493FF0:01D12518]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mif/0bcfIqiMUEexv0dztRBzQWY7JQ4>
Subject: [mif] Concensus call on MPVD ID document
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mif/>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 11:22:09 -0000
Hello all There were two concensus calls related to MPVD ID document https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-mif-mpvd-id-02.txt 1) Whether there should be an external mechanism to look up pvd information? There were 10 people say Yes, 0 say No. 2) Whether we should wait on defining the PVD until 1st protocol to use it There were 10 people say Yes, 0 say No. Here we confirm these two in the mailing list again Best regards, Cochairs