Re: [mif] route-option vs drlo, possible advantageous way forward
Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Fri, 28 October 2011 12:27 UTC
Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56AAC21F8B8C for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 05:27:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id btkot08Q4Bw5 for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 05:27:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000:226:55ff:fe57:14db]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4A3321F8B4C for <mif@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 05:27:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ringo.viagenie.ca (ringo.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:c000::67]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1575420CC2 for <mif@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 08:27:13 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4EAA9FA0.8080105@viagenie.ca>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 08:27:12 -0400
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110720 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mif@ietf.org
References: <4EAA9BEA.1060108@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EAA9BEA.1060108@gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [mif] route-option vs drlo, possible advantageous way forward
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 12:27:14 -0000
On 2011-10-28 08:11, Alexandru Petrescu wrote: > - draft route-option would do all routes except default route. > - draft drlo would do only default route and no generic route. I've been watching the discussion unfold. I am still unconvinced of any benefit of this proposal. Furthermore, I think there has been enough discussion at this point. We should move on. Simon -- DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca STUN/TURN server --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
- [mif] route-option vs drlo, possible advantageous… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [mif] route-option vs drlo, possible advantag… Simon Perreault
- Re: [mif] route-option vs drlo, possible advantag… Ted Lemon