Re: [mif] AD review of MPVD Architecture ***feedback needed from MIF working group participants ***

Dmitry Anipko <dmitry.anipko@gmail.com> Thu, 22 January 2015 19:11 UTC

Return-Path: <dmitry.anipko@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 119A61A1B60 for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 11:11:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XvTBzgI9vL9z for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 11:11:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-x230.google.com (mail-wg0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4DFC1A1B5B for <mif@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 11:11:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id x12so3549016wgg.7 for <mif@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 11:11:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=uR95i3A4oFR/KnCi5IhnAu8BAPeaoaITYlAEzZTuc7E=; b=Q50F9i5FNeyTczitPTSNsmBXxbt9d0zKBvv/a6O51YlPnfeE1rL0BYtFIz1yekSq0I j8TIwFFXHh2W9IU80BVS0UzTpOKWGuFBR0tKH1gSB2nVClxmTzM7L6vXqkZkVHNtE0J0 9+n3j75v4Vn6bVx5lxq+wx+qrCm4UIlm7/kA0tgNSLnoMkWy3euKHbetL3ql0pS3Q3YT fPn3ndUxUNoiqBdMZl1oCpLYfIpHLtgc0d0cBOiVXYE4RCBA0Pefy2WXgnd8A7qYqZF5 z/Fg9Wh4MUDUj78BBcIrIyzfb1jQdmnSrE9TqlPdwd1P0K0I/a2J1xeyweAffHoT/Xd1 K7nw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.6.70 with SMTP id y6mr5863746wjy.97.1421953893542; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 11:11:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.180.101.70 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Jan 2015 11:11:33 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <D023FC1E-68F9-477D-AEB7-6B95B15F1728@nominum.com>
References: <9071C858-BBCA-483C-94CD-E7C2584980F0@nominum.com> <CACurXJhq5PyogN=J-kHBjqiNO1VTFsm_F9e-YdK+Q9Zqy_pKjw@mail.gmail.com> <27E34197-0DCA-4328-98A8-CD5C1A3534A9@nominum.com> <CACurXJgLxXBud27b+CnQNkrXBJkunJ_x5J7iKa8A3+OsmMHJBQ@mail.gmail.com> <931A7C39-6DAE-43C0-BF2E-3B6DC08F1F5A@nominum.com> <CACurXJjyCvsoX-QRLFfucKyahGK0SsbxMV28FuW_NGKiO+VhnQ@mail.gmail.com> <D023FC1E-68F9-477D-AEB7-6B95B15F1728@nominum.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 11:11:33 -0800
Message-ID: <CACurXJh3fJ_rQuKUoOceuD=+H+eaQNse-=U0gWufj2bZwzBbgg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dmitry Anipko <dmitry.anipko@gmail.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b5d98afb630f3050d4270ef"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mif/4wmFjv4_eYKOGXwwrkNMP2PXjko>
Cc: "mif@ietf.org List" <mif@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mif] AD review of MPVD Architecture ***feedback needed from MIF working group participants ***
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif/>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 19:11:38 -0000

Sorry for the delay, will submit the revision today/tomorrow.


On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> wrote:

> On Jan 15, 2015, at 12:41 AM, Dmitry Anipko <dmitry.anipko@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Thanks Ted. If there are no other inputs by end of Friday, I will remove
> the respective text from the draft.
>
> Time's a-wasting.
>
>