IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mif] Server selection document is "band-aid" not solution

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Fri, 18 November 2011 05:14 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 968FC11E80C6 for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 21:14:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.57
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.57 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.029, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IBhcpg9E4cot for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 21:14:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exprod7og103.obsmtp.com (exprod7og103.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.159]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD3C911E8097 for <mif@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 21:14:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob103.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTsXpuJU+MPVjYRKHg/GXTPotsQOfz6az@postini.com; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 21:14:35 PST
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76AD31B82E4 for <mif@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 21:14:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-01.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68ACE19005D; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 21:14:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from MBX-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.133]) by CAS-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.131]) with mapi id 14.01.0339.001; Thu, 17 Nov 2011 21:14:32 -0800
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [mif] Server selection document is "band-aid" not solution
Thread-Index: AQHMpM8ZeOJMqkjpCkunz3mHScTfw5Ww4w+AgAAE1gD//5hqNIAB3BkA//+KU9WAAJlcgP//mDME
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 05:14:31 +0000
Message-ID: <E370D6AE-3710-48CF-943A-C7A18C026598@nominum.com>
References: <4EC46D52.8030909@ogud.com> <916CE6CF87173740BC8A2CE44309696204192558@008-AM1MPN1-053.mgdnok.nokia.com>, <4EC479E0.6030704@gmail.com> <292CDFDE-32DE-43D9-83DD-86D3978F3EEF@nominum.com>, <4EC5B25C.7010903@gmail.com> <FE5A324F-6D21-4EE0-A3AD-C80D0D83BD87@nominum.com>, <4EC5D04B.9080509@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EC5D04B.9080509@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "mif@ietf.org" <mif@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mif] Server selection document is "band-aid" not solution
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 05:14:42 -0000

On Nov 18, 2011, at 11:26 AM, "Brian E Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> Today? Probably not. But that doesn't mean it shouldn't be a
> goal. Things like knowing which egresses are subject to which
> ingress filters, for example, could be known to the border routers.

I am skeptical that my hotel will get this right.   And they _do_ typically have egress filters.   So it seems like a shaky foundation upon which to base a general solution.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email