Re: [mif] Last Call for MIF DNS server selection document

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Sat, 10 September 2011 00:02 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF08721F8678; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 17:02:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.47
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.47 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.129, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oReZAmnwx-R1; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 17:02:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (out4.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EBEB21F84B1; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 17:02:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.44]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8351D24DFC; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 20:04:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend1.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.160]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 09 Sep 2011 20:04:01 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :references:to; s=smtpout; bh=2bGyu9Wd2xskmFdP6w7gQmG6lMo=; b=ZX RIe49AAEySXtRLcxihkDGzg7zSh8ME8VxNRh/a+TWsVntEGHiRj4fpv9HVTCeF8Q JSos6I/KYl526fm9SM/qrDD7NOq0WYYKGubEbxTXs4/DJa+Efo9q0OldURQOw5kA WRMvlR/ei8Q/1WFj2JVmteL6XYzGfuklPaD5jkbv4=
X-Sasl-enc: I0KSVIUi8RRXoRAIwZcG2VBJ/3YKU8NqT+qRhoL26ElE 1315613041
Received: from host65-16-145-177.birch.net (host65-16-145-177.birch.net [65.16.145.177]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4796D720519; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 20:04:00 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E6AA248.6000406@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 20:03:54 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4D854606-64C6-4F7F-81A1-B15F1054E8BE@network-heretics.com>
References: <COL118-W599D9E8760C3E370077FC3B1140@phx.gbl> <4E683F9B.7020905@gmail.com> <916CE6CF87173740BC8A2CE4430969620256F33F@008-AM1MPN1-032.mgdnok.nokia.com> <4E692D62.5080902@gmail.com> <BFFE3312-4DE3-432D-8DC7-20987AB3E34A@network-heretics.com> <916CE6CF87173740BC8A2CE443096962025704BA@008-AM1MPN1-032.mgdnok.nokia.com> <0A7B9663-0C40-4D19-BDBE-7EB72430D47D@network-heretics.com> <20110909230115.GG46494@shinkuro.com> <4E6AA248.6000406@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: mif@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mif] Last Call for MIF DNS server selection document
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 00:02:05 -0000

On Sep 9, 2011, at 7:33 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

>> doomed to the eventual state of affairs
>> where the exact same question asked of servers in different networks
>> would give different answers.  We can't change the past. 
> 
> As long as the reply for a given query is always NXDOMAIN
> *except* for the one name server serving the particular offshoot
> of the namespace that the location-dependent domain is in,
> we have not broken the uniqueness of the namespace.

Actually, I disagree.  NXDOMAIN means "this domain does not exist".     Applications should be able to rely on that.

Keith