IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mif] DNS selection with HE-MIF

GangChen <phdgang@gmail.com> Thu, 07 February 2013 02:50 UTC

Return-Path: <phdgang@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4366621E804B for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 18:50:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.535
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.535 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.064, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ol4AWHG2YiOT for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 18:50:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qe0-f46.google.com (mail-qe0-f46.google.com [209.85.128.46]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA7A21E8049 for <mif@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 18:50:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qe0-f46.google.com with SMTP id 1so977741qec.33 for <mif@ietf.org>; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 18:50:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=bj2FyblybWSwESFAEFAiD1sFsQM1KDoQfrQelO82hn0=; b=sM0PsWXvbRHzxOgpKEYYEFnBJsdp51kB9t+aJqRNV3Rno5eaX+0coN/vP1QMsITf7z N6GQEuyTkEVnBjZ29PAATfcsyKZvieun9GFN7GwGLxMVBbDx70/l+x2AXrcaX0X+aCkK tP/xEsw0sbiCCajWuwpqm3fFDDq+6an7piMtEmQzCHLjGkl9AbIlEg7+x698HzTkRqm+ kygRLVX1/ABs15ek517a31d18J8Lt2tS+Ubv8g7TW/muj+tuGfO6YK/jTOfDJ859tjhB Yovi7lY18pOWUjMSwbnqBXBTDRhsXuOqMmgMGwOMnUjXehPuhmujvvNM2iGIODVUpHzJ VTtQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.17.198 with SMTP id t6mr74987qaa.84.1360205424124; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 18:50:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.49.48.12 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 18:50:23 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630747481F51@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
References: <CAM+vMERak2vAoYFeSLRep2xjpm480qPjutyv4-tV=KtU0XO=fw@mail.gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630747479BA9@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <CAM+vMETvE==qUZO2_rhyUB+=ChUR4a9CoTCF+q=gBL2cRA+0UA@mail.gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63074747BB1E@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <CAM+vMER=CPNpXTcrqOpGqEaH+GpA81pyH_D3Hja+1jQqNTNxqw@mail.gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63074747D7F7@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <CAM+vMESEiTOTHorbaqSEDbiKPV06Vt2pW3TAs8+Of4=mnVcbNA@mail.gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63074747F348@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <CAM+vMERqcZy-748Sp46QTjVtfh_0JrWm8xNquG-vbZVYikO+Uw@mail.gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63074747F7EF@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <CAM+vMETf8z4opWYXLTCBv2+VTaoOWnpB9ziXgaXw0dxE6QF8Pw@mail.gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630747481F51@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 10:50:23 +0800
Message-ID: <CAM+vMERcs37PYYx15=fdonvkpYmB_fyEnyv0aSuUrUCsQCSMxQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: GangChen <phdgang@gmail.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: mif <mif@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-mif-happy-eyeballs-extension <draft-ietf-mif-happy-eyeballs-extension@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mif] DNS selection with HE-MIF
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 02:50:25 -0000

Hello Ted,

2013/2/7, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>:
> On Feb 6, 2013, at 2:29 AM, GangChen <phdgang@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I guess the information on this link may relieve your concerns.
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif/current/msg01138.html
>
> I am not looking to be reassured.   I would like the proposal to address the
> real and serious issues I have raised.   You are of course free to say "no,
> we do not intend to address these concerns."

Your concern has been understood well.
It would be seriously considered at next update.
Hopefully, we could come up with a thoughtful solution after checking
with other co-authors.
If there is a proposal in your mind, that is highly appreciated.

Best Regards

Gang

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email