Re: [mif] clarification on HE-MIF algorithm
GangChen <phdgang@gmail.com> Tue, 24 November 2015 06:43 UTC
Return-Path: <phdgang@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E09AC1A0013 for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 22:43:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0G6Liig69Q2y for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 22:43:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22d.google.com (mail-ig0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17A731A0010 for <mif@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 22:43:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by igvg19 with SMTP id g19so89464900igv.1 for <mif@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 22:43:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=i/Wa1mTfgw8ij1juRAhy9ViiSrYrd0rJ5fZm4nfxRsk=; b=WMDyNImFRjgZiQiEQ1Xu6wNaUFx8j+9LZ8bBzEI8lLom+j0VMEV5B9fhlwf2sziSQ7 UCUjcGQQCUqKvRUHrGlJqgGtEE9PI5IJZy2dXGGg3W8LeGM9s2ec2DsGcZXiCf1Llni4 VEYGLVOAL65qrKlqJBbbRWjVWnhScz4PJC7GcqYW8YCFjQEY6pFg33ebFIrFqCg4PQ36 UpuLwXbdsO4h+0n0nmpfNsGW+KD34vWbyJOZ3Vxb6a3yHDMtVKxC1dJ7drhE0PcVn1y0 P0Tm6AZ9u0w+TCC2Tf50ObzqtHQo5OACP2sWUHnPz8o2t5vuS+Xwe00w3jDCW2BhwK4Z pcug==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.26.33 with SMTP id i1mr16456342igg.27.1448347411404; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 22:43:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.36.154.3 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 22:43:31 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <BY2PR03MB412D257127022C820331E0BA3070@BY2PR03MB412.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAM+vMETqmJSEdPzBUqacH8a1fMwvxeMwew1vJG5g7sxMHRfDwA@mail.gmail.com> <BY2PR03MB412D257127022C820331E0BA3070@BY2PR03MB412.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 14:43:31 +0800
Message-ID: <CAM+vMESBkVDbZ2PimOUzSnKBt7pdwNAofUWwVEXvv46C5wz4tg@mail.gmail.com>
From: GangChen <phdgang@gmail.com>
To: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mif/FPSPPqHdcCZ9BLo4G3FGWMh-rjU>
Cc: Hui Deng <denghui02@hotmail.com>, "mif@ietf.org" <mif@ietf.org>, Margaret Cullen <mrcullen42@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [mif] clarification on HE-MIF algorithm
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mif/>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 06:43:34 -0000
Thank you, Dave. It's getting better understanding. The HE-MIF draft doesn't intend to make a particular algorithm mandatory. The draft also only describes requirements. Since the draft is stable for quite a while, we are seeking wglc if all questions are clarified. BRs Gang 2015-11-24 0:44 GMT+08:00, Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>: > The grammar in the minutes looks bad. What I said was: > > "RFC 6555 does not specify a mandatory algorithm, only requirements for > algorithms, > and an example algorithm. Does this draft try to make a particular > algorithm mandatory?" > > -----Original Message----- > From: GangChen [mailto:phdgang@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 1:19 AM > To: mif@ietf.org; Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com> > Cc: Margaret Cullen <mrcullen42@gmail.com>; Hui Deng > <denghui02@hotmail.com> > Subject: [mif] clarification on HE-MIF algorithm > > wg, > > I would like to follow the meeting minutes to clarify a question from the > discussion. > > " > DT - Clarifying question - base happy happy eyeballs spec has two > algos, none of them mandatory no mandatory algorithm Does this > specify a mandatory algo? > " > > The HE-MIF doesn't specify mandatory algorithm. > Basically, HE-MIF is doing a similar way with RFC6555. > The draft describes step-wise requirements for any candidate algorithm. > > BRs > > Gang > > 2015-11-22 8:40 GMT+08:00, Hui Deng <denghui02@hotmail.com>: >> Hello all >> >> Appreciate Ian Farrer and Ted Lemon kindly help for minutes Also >> Mikael Abrahamsson for Jabber >> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2fwww.i >> etf.org%2fproceedings%2f94%2fminutes%2fminutes-94-mif&data=01%7c01%7cd >> thaler%40microsoft.com%7c6bd2810ca4334051554508d2f3e718cb%7c72f988bf86 >> f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=%2bRV%2fK%2fz8QpfT2hibsHwfmnZe%2fItdr >> sF6vlPXxJs3oso%3d >> >> Please feel free to let chairs know whether you have some revision >> >> thanks a lot >> >> DENG Hui >> >
- [mif] clarification on HE-MIF algorithm GangChen
- Re: [mif] clarification on HE-MIF algorithm Dave Thaler
- Re: [mif] clarification on HE-MIF algorithm GangChen
- Re: [mif] clarification on HE-MIF algorithm Hui Deng