Re: [mif] WGLC for draft-ietf-mif-mpvd-id

Hi,

Before this document can proceed, I think that there is still a significant open point. Multiple or single PVD ID formats?

This question has been raised a few times at WG meetings, but there is no reflection in the draft as it stands. This is an excerpt from the IETF91 minutes:

Margaret: 2 changes proposed: move to single unique short ID (UUID) 
  and allow for additional info to be a part of the ID. So can we 
  try to reach consensus on each?

Who thinks we should move to one unique format? 
 (a couple of hands; 2nd time asking had about 10 hands)
Who thinks we should not use a single unique format? 
 (no hands)
 OK. Single unique.
So, I would like to see this discussion take place before the document progresses.

Thanks,
Ian

> On 14 Jul 2015, at 17:18, Hui Deng <denghui02@hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello all,
>  
> We would like to have a 3 weeks WGLC for the below document:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mif-mpvd-id/ <http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mif-mpvd-id/>
>  
> Please help to send your comments to this thread.
> This WGLC will end on Aug. 5th.
>  
> Many thanks
>  
> DENG Hui
> _______________________________________________
> mif mailing list
> mif@ietf.org <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>