Re: [mif] Decision regarding MIF

[Jouni Korhonen <[e-mail]>]

My take is that anything "mobility" related can be hosted in DMM (within 
the limits of the charter, of course). The coordination part as pointed 
out by Mikael is a bit of a challenge.

- Jouni (DMM co-chair)

5/9/2016, 12:10 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson kirjoitti:
> On Sun, 8 May 2016, Terry Manderson wrote:
>
>> I will be closing the MIF Working Group, however I will be leaving the
>> Mailing List open for ongoing discussion.
>
> Hi,
>
> With the MIF working group closed, where should work in this area be done?
>
> I don't really care where the work is done, as long as it gets done.
> INTAREA?
>
> Since we're seeing people show up with solutions and request these to be
> implemented (draft-mccann-dmm-prefixcost for instance), I'd like to see
> this being coordinated somewhere. Or is there no agreement that this
> should be coordinated?
>
> Because I don't think we'll find the best technical architecture overall
> by working groups independently coming up with solutions in the same
> space and then go and request L3 protocol enhancements individually
> without overall coordination. In my view, this would mean that either
> nothing gets done (because 6MAN will say no), or we get too many
> solutions in the same problem space leading to fragmentation and
> different technologies not playing nice with each other.
>
> So while I realise why you've made your decision, this is the one
> question that is still left unanswered for me.
>