Re: [mif] WGLC for MIF happy eyeballs

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Tue, 08 December 2015 12:45 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51E371ACEAF for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 04:45:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.961
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.961 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vkh0EjE0sdVU for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 04:45:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0B661ACE72 for <mif@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 04:45:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 3A755A3; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 13:45:32 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1449578732; bh=t+BtlhZuznqp4cxOr/Nv72Es2LAfXCcMFPjLe71dC60=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=FDgRQ7vjqDtAoPu6gSM5P5xlarDpgAmpccah6gryzI4F1gMLloRQ0cd1OsMR1jCsB N/SsPvGZX0aHXs9shemk31UEJULPBG4efUA0dobHK3r912h80+hmaAoihgI6Jpxa2V L/0Z8h5Lyknwy+N1V3NUi0R4tgwJB5+SPmZTA0qs=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36884A2; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 13:45:32 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 13:45:32 +0100
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Hui Deng <denghui02@hotmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <COL125-W388E68C8AD20C9B7D7BFC4B1080@phx.gbl>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1512081338010.20919@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <COL125-W388E68C8AD20C9B7D7BFC4B1080@phx.gbl>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mif/RA96G2949XC_rv24-xqfFvuUMEo>
Cc: Margaret <margaretw42@gmail.com>, "mif@ietf.org" <mif@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mif] WGLC for MIF happy eyeballs
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mif/>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 12:45:42 -0000

On Tue, 8 Dec 2015, Hui Deng wrote:

> Hello all
>
> We have two weeks WG last call for below document:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-chen-mif-happy-eyeballs-extension-04.txt
>
> Please send your comments to this thread.
> This WGLC will end on Dec. 22nd.

The above link is wrong, it links to a 3 year old revision of the 
document.

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mif-happy-eyeballs-extension-07 
seems to be the latest.

It's also my opinion that I would not want this document sent off until we 
have decided what to do with the rest of the MIF documents, it's my 
opinion that the WGLC call is premature. I believe that MIF-HE is 
important, but I also think we should be more ready with the rest of the 
architecture before we ship this document off.

Some other comments:

I would like to see "3/4G interface" replaced with "mobile data interface" 
or "3GPP interface" or something else.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se