Re: [mif] Questions in last 95th MIF meeting

It seems clear to me that there is still work to do, particularly to make
MIF possible on a homenet.   I think rechartering to make that happen is
the right move, and intend to work on those documents.

On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> As discussed at the meeting at IETF 95:
>
> 1) Yes, I am working on PvDs
> 2) I believe MIF should recharter to focus on the remaining work
> (primarily, defining discovery and use of Explicit PvDs; and defining
> requirements for use and interaction with PvDs)
> 3) Yes, I would like to work on ideas and drafts for PvDs around the
> recharter items mentioned above
>
> I think that the work that MIF has done to lay down the definitions of
> PvDs is useful, but there is a bit more work that should be done to make
> sure these concepts can be usefully applied to real-life scenarios that
> require explicit PvD configuration. Leaving that work by the wayside would
> potentially hinder other working groups that have mentioned MIF as a source
> of solutions for this space.
>
> Thanks,
> Tommy
>
> On Apr 21, 2016, at 8:21 AM, Hui Deng <denghui02@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello all
>
> Chairs would like to ask questions again in the list about rechartering
> for AD's reference due to lacking of participation.
>
> Q1: Are you working on PVDs?
>
> Q2: What do you think that MIF should do at this moment?
> 1) Recharter
> 2) Hiatus
> 3) Close
>
> Q3: Do you like to work on PvDS?
>
> Many thanks for your feedback
>
> Cochairs.
>
> _______________________________________________
> mif mailing list
> mif@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mif mailing list
> mif@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif
>
>