[mif] 答复: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-baker-6man-multi-homed-host-00.txt

Liang Geng <liang.geng@hotmail.com> Sun, 20 September 2015 16:14 UTC

Return-Path: <liang.geng@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A208F1ACD6D for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 09:14:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.679
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.679 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, CN_BODY_35=0.339, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MzXWLcsYLxpV for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 09:14:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SNT004-OMC1S33.hotmail.com (snt004-omc1s33.hotmail.com [65.55.90.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E1841ACD6B for <mif@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 09:14:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SNT153-DS19 ([65.55.90.9]) by SNT004-OMC1S33.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Sun, 20 Sep 2015 09:14:54 -0700
X-TMN: [+0+CrVw7CQMD+CVxj1qNDSG8N0yiSfGi]
X-Originating-Email: [liang.geng@hotmail.com]
Message-ID: <SNT153-DS19CF43DD33F54D5FB0162587470@phx.gbl>
From: Liang Geng <liang.geng@hotmail.com>
To: "'Fred Baker (fred)'" <fred@cisco.com>, mif@ietf.org
References: <20150807144043.10132.18362.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <01A096FF-9E7E-406E-BE2E-14EDB99A2D2D@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <01A096FF-9E7E-406E-BE2E-14EDB99A2D2D@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 00:14:53 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AQHQ0R8TtalPea2GBkaP/zHTUd5sMJ5FxfAg
Content-Language: zh-cn
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Sep 2015 16:14:54.0739 (UTC) FILETIME=[7C88D630:01D0F3BF]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mif/YzL-388ebCFOn65YOxjlAEjvcn0>
Subject: [mif] 答复: Fwd: I-D Action: draft-baker-6man-multi-homed-host-00.txt
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mif/>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 16:14:59 -0000

Hi Fred,

I have just read through this draft (the most recent 03 version).

The draft is very pleasant to read and I believe it focuses on the same
multi-homed issue MIF WG is working on. It very well described how IPV6
hosts/network are expected to behave in multi-homed scenario.

In mif, Provisioning Domain (PvD) is introduced to associate and identify
network configurations for a particular interface. I think it is a good idea
to see if there is any conflict between the mechanism in PvD solution and
the host/network behavior described in your draft. However, I don't see
obvious ones at present. 

Best wishes,
Liang

> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: mif [mailto:mif-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Fred Baker (fred)
> 发送时间: 2015年8月10日 22:04
> 收件人: mif@ietf.org
> 主题: [mif] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-baker-6man-multi-homed-host-00.txt
> 
> This is actually being discussed in 6man, as the chairs requested it
there, but
> MIF might have comments to pass along.
> 
> > Begin forwarded message:
> >
> > From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
> > Subject: I-D Action: draft-baker-6man-multi-homed-host-00.txt
> > Date: August 7, 2015 at 7:40:43 AM PDT
> > To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
> > Reply-To: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
> >
> >
> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> >
> >
> >        Title           : Host routing in a multi-prefix network
> >        Authors         : Fred Baker
> >                          Brian Carpenter
> > 	Filename        : draft-baker-6man-multi-homed-host-00.txt
> > 	Pages           : 6
> > 	Date            : 2015-08-07
> >
> > Abstract:
> >   This note describes expected host behavior in a network that has more
> >   than one prefix, each allocated by an upstream network that
> >   implements BCP 38 filtering.
> >
> >
> > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-baker-6man-multi-homed-host/
> >
> > There's also a htmlized version available at:
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-baker-6man-multi-homed-host-00
> >
> >
> > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> > submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at
tools.ietf.org.
> >
> > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > I-D-Announce mailing list
> > I-D-Announce@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
> > Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or
> > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt