Re: [mif] Nits in draft-ietf-mif-mpvd-arch-08.txt

Dmitry Anipko <dmitry.anipko@gmail.com> Wed, 14 January 2015 07:10 UTC

Return-Path: <dmitry.anipko@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E4E51A89B4 for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 23:10:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VCL0YB-qE7LS for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 23:10:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-x22d.google.com (mail-we0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BF591A89AE for <mif@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 23:10:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f173.google.com with SMTP id q58so7047823wes.4 for <mif@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 23:10:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=LQHHlWTsk0Tpm8IKVm+dBnypWYp+Tvcdyq8QA4GZHDU=; b=d9wuFoCbeEdmXzNtmmMatRIQOqJFATXwR0dDXM/qGH1bLGT4FqH23LkZhkqVgFLJ+R 5BRrtOkP22CYR7iu/PEoyHhKpGY+NPzwgCZXz0C+rWaqQJ6FykrdCxJVoJUC5tNhgi18 6uiHeM7/RfVQo665h7C4jP2y85pWMqHMWzEeba5zRAC9IIH/OzdHyhRXgl0jZMBfKmls j0ToGr4t80W1sHeA4pQLzeUb3X+1K13rdxIYthaqOe8vGfzJ8cIOfk/hCHJCmwHkNaMw rUJgvKH2tSSqjntM6TeltFkU5T0vyFq/W4n9+acDMXVOaPNA7s8fk7Wn0t3enDRwh6zB ukeQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.78.204 with SMTP id d12mr4096566wjx.37.1421219454809; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 23:10:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.180.101.70 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2015 23:10:54 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <54B2C551.4090600@gmail.com>
References: <20150111012016.21272.42972.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <54B2C551.4090600@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 23:10:54 -0800
Message-ID: <CACurXJicoyaakmxodVzkmZ25RoqAyedo3uW5aAUOuruHb=KhNA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dmitry Anipko <dmitry.anipko@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7beb9124c07d8b050c97705d
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mif/aBBB7EXXev5c7SsI13ZMwFaQCYU>
Cc: "mif@ietf.org List" <mif@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mif] Nits in draft-ietf-mif-mpvd-arch-08.txt
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif/>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 07:10:58 -0000

Thanks Brian. I will address these in the next rev.

On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Brian E Carpenter <
brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

> > 2.2. Implicit PvDs and Incremental Adoption of Explicit PvDs
> ...
> >    PvD-aware nodes shall treat betwork information from different
> >    interfaces, which is not identified as belonging explicitly to some
> >    PvD, as belonging to separate PvDs, one per interface.
>
> s/betwork/network/
>
> > 3.2. Securing PvD Information
> >
> >
> >    DHCPv6 and RAs both provide some form of authentication to ensure the
> >    identity of the source as well as the integrity of the secured
> >    message content.  While this is useful, determining authenticity does
> >    tell a node whether the configuration source is actually allowed to
> >    provide information from a given PvD.
>
> Presumably "does" in the second sentence is intended to be "does not".
>
> > 3.4. Selective Propagation
>
> The abbreviation "ORO" is used but not defined.
>
>    Brian
>
> _______________________________________________
> mif mailing list
> mif@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif
>