Re: [mif] Nits in draft-ietf-mif-mpvd-arch-08.txt

Thanks Brian. I will address these in the next rev.

On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Brian E Carpenter <
brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

> > 2.2. Implicit PvDs and Incremental Adoption of Explicit PvDs
> ...
> >    PvD-aware nodes shall treat betwork information from different
> >    interfaces, which is not identified as belonging explicitly to some
> >    PvD, as belonging to separate PvDs, one per interface.
>
> s/betwork/network/
>
> > 3.2. Securing PvD Information
> >
> >
> >    DHCPv6 and RAs both provide some form of authentication to ensure the
> >    identity of the source as well as the integrity of the secured
> >    message content.  While this is useful, determining authenticity does
> >    tell a node whether the configuration source is actually allowed to
> >    provide information from a given PvD.
>
> Presumably "does" in the second sentence is intended to be "does not".
>
> > 3.4. Selective Propagation
>
> The abbreviation "ORO" is used but not defined.
>
>    Brian
>
> _______________________________________________
> mif mailing list
> mif@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif
>