Re: [mif] Adoption of API document as the MIF WG document

Hui Deng <denghui02@gmail.com> Fri, 03 February 2012 09:36 UTC

Return-Path: <denghui02@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FC6A21F860F for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 01:36:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.084
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.084 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.514, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OIRKVE2BOG2y for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 01:36:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-f44.google.com (mail-yw0-f44.google.com [209.85.213.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5FE021F8629 for <mif@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 01:36:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by yhkk25 with SMTP id k25so1749443yhk.31 for <mif@ietf.org>; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:36:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=jih6b9hqQCbd5JKhks12ZZrXnvEq/l4X3L8cmiuSCZg=; b=k4BQrGi3pb1dTkO4ouHRmAN2UIYxwjxOyCn3YuiA/5REh9nJ/otVFr0yxZ688Huw38 r2B3p1+cuoxHwtYIIXMJHVdYAJgkSSZIzpF/HdSis8VoRzzoT1GdnJmwJQQ0wvZTPp0l EbKVAerXIdCRdOzBNVYuagW1gzHU3Qsnm8p+A=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.191.134 with SMTP id g6mr9328040yhn.95.1328261815379; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:36:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.146.238.11 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 01:36:55 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <COL118-W224376376AE7A3CC854753B1A30@phx.gbl>
References: <COL118-W224376376AE7A3CC854753B1A30@phx.gbl>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:36:55 +0800
Message-ID: <CANF0JMDMB1z7bBHB_Ey+_Pf2aFt=HSez7sznEJ=K+nKE0HcWNg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Hui Deng <denghui02@gmail.com>
To: Hui Deng <denghui02@hotmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="20cf305b0ab6aca68e04b80c0d6e"
Cc: Margaret <margaretw42@gmail.com>, mif@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mif] Adoption of API document as the MIF WG document
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 09:36:56 -0000

Hello all

We have heard sufficient support about the adoption of this draft with only
1 pre-condition disagreement,
The pre-condition is proposing a new charter that should be discussed in
the next ietf meeting,
but adoption this draft won't prevent from the new recharter proposal.

Please authors submit a new working group document.

Thanks a lot

-Hui


 Hello all
>
> Based on last time IETF 82th MIF meeting, we are calling for the adoption
> of API document as the working group document in the mailing list.
> Just want to conform if anybody have different opinion on this.
>
> thanks
>
> -Chairs
>
> _______________________________________________
> mif mailing list
> mif@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif
>
>