Re: [mif] WGLC for MIF happy eyeballs

GangChen <phdgang@gmail.com> Fri, 18 December 2015 01:42 UTC

Return-Path: <phdgang@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A18D1B31E5 for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 17:42:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h146hVzfFuTJ for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 17:42:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-x236.google.com (mail-ig0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD0B61B31E4 for <mif@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 17:42:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ig0-x236.google.com with SMTP id to18so24786110igc.0 for <mif@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 17:42:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=lr02oXY56+3UQXilx5o+F05y3zWLva1bQVg5Vxknbck=; b=wJt3dQSS/UIkgjKoRwSWefhiyTxsfhXhq0oe6+pJWM4TjwhuH0yC2SFPlAWYGmbBq2 N8KYK0dgrX9L7mTr7+THHtTonnmN75+uYVE76f7E6mw8xBv3ziw/WNykogD+ZdmOhdGi AGZw3bOWeDoP6z5NcF/Vv6fBVz6OhdIA6VWEbE2U9aoJ1VgSHwO2+7G1AusmVBz/+jNP st0SiqgCN8YJLrPtzlax/b5shnZmh75BnfgeRvLzxdmKA/j6tGSH6elYp8TEw5TPoEuP j3/b3f211+XvAg0GKufvG3MWVfVxuEujWE78M5cbNaf2HkdMPtR2axNXl2NzhWPL7qGb EtFw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.20.36 with SMTP id k4mr612749ige.87.1450402929089; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 17:42:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.36.154.3 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 17:42:08 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAProHAQSyyCYGfwo9yQVs2DFesibhz-syvtsBqY+kouQsjoivQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <COL125-W388E68C8AD20C9B7D7BFC4B1080@phx.gbl> <CAProHAQSyyCYGfwo9yQVs2DFesibhz-syvtsBqY+kouQsjoivQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:42:08 +0800
Message-ID: <CAM+vMES_ANnY3cgQ1FYvGEuf=z8GCqGssDNL-10fdsiKp0K62A@mail.gmail.com>
From: GangChen <phdgang@gmail.com>
To: Zhen Cao <zehn.cao@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mif/f3ijIb5q6Adh1mWGwPB0YGNNgM0>
Cc: Margaret <margaretw42@gmail.com>, "mif@ietf.org" <mif@ietf.org>, Hui Deng <denghui02@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [mif] WGLC for MIF happy eyeballs
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mif/>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 01:42:11 -0000

Hello Zhen,

Thank you for the comments.
I would like to propose the following new texts for the abstract:

This memo proposes extensions to the Happy Eyeball(HE) defined in RFC6555 to
fit into multiple provisioning domain architecture. Happy Eyeballs in
MIF would make the
selection process smoother by using the connectivity checks over a
pre-filtered interfaces according to defined policy.  This would
choose the fastest interface with an automatic fallback.

Please kindly to check.

BRs

Gang

2015-12-17 22:34 GMT+08:00, Zhen Cao <zehn.cao@gmail.com>:
> Dear All,
>
> To clarify,  I read the draft indicated by this link
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mif-happy-eyeballs-extension-07
>
> I find the document is ready to be published.  (Actually it should be
> published earlier.  This problem was well recognized at the very
> beginning, but now it seems  the interest has declined. )
>
> Some editorial comments to the abstract:
>
> Old:  Currently the interface selection in multi-interface environment is
>    exclusive - only one interface can be used at the time, frequently
>    needing manual intervention.
>
> - I do like this argument, neither should any MIFers, since the MIF wg
> has developed many solutions to help interface selection based on
> domain names, APNs, PvDs.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Zhen
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Hui Deng <denghui02@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello all
>>
>> We have two weeks WG last call for below document:
>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-chen-mif-happy-eyeballs-extension-04.txt
>>
>> Please send your comments to this thread.
>> This WGLC will end on Dec. 22nd.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Cochairs.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mif mailing list
>> mif@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mif mailing list
> mif@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif
>