IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mif] I-D draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option-03 published

Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Mon, 12 September 2011 13:10 UTC

Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E516621F8B06; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 06:10:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id prd1ehIXr8+S; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 06:10:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000:226:55ff:fe57:14db]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EF5021F8B53; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 06:10:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ringo.viagenie.ca (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:230:c000:21d:60ff:fed7:e732]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5AC7520DC4; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 09:12:28 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4E6E053B.7000305@viagenie.ca>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 09:12:27 -0400
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110720 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: maximilien mouton <maximilien.mouton@gmail.com>
References: <20110910220345.29077.66749.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4E6BE7BF.5030501@gmail.com> <4E6C8F4A.308@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E6C8F4A.308@gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org, mif@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mif] I-D draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option-03 published
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 13:10:35 -0000

On 2011-09-11 06:36, maximilien mouton wrote:
> I thus think that a client should be able to require only a default
> route (and no other route).

Why? What's the use case?

Are you working with hosts that do not have a generic routing table and
only support a single default route?

Simon
-- 
DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email