IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mif] bare names (was: [dnsext] 2nd Last Call for MIF DNS server selection document)

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Wed, 19 October 2011 16:16 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A84221F8AD6 for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 09:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.489
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.489 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.109, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3k2Bodq0XpuI for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 09:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og106.obsmtp.com (exprod7og106.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.165]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF14521F8AD2 for <mif@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 09:16:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob106.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 09:16:09 PDT
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B9441B830F for <mif@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 09:15:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-01.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54269190065; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 09:15:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from MBX-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.133]) by CAS-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.131]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 09:15:14 -0700
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Thread-Topic: [mif] bare names (was: [dnsext] 2nd Last Call for MIF DNS server selection document)
Thread-Index: AQHMjm3rbOmsTKztt0GFP7I6u0RcMZWETQyA
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:15:13 +0000
Message-ID: <2328BDA8-57EA-4A36-90E7-B11B2FA3248C@nominum.com>
References: <COL118-W55403198A984BAAE44BA47B1F70@phx.gbl> <916CE6CF87173740BC8A2CE44309696203782D75@008-AM1MPN1-037.mgdnok.nokia.com> <121DABD1-65E8-4275-8471-9FA38D25C434@nominet.org.uk> <8EFC868A-8796-4013-BB07-F3D33F33C552@network-heretics.com> <20111019132633.GB18523@shinkuro.com> <79350865-2ED5-4B12-BA36-B53550CB01F7@network-heretics.com> <20111019142626.GC18523@shinkuro.com> <5302EE55-5EF8-4C9C-9CF5-F7008A900374@network-heretics.com>
In-Reply-To: <5302EE55-5EF8-4C9C-9CF5-F7008A900374@network-heretics.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.1.10]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2328BDA857EA4A3690E7B11B2FA3248Cnominumcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "<mif@ietf.org>" <mif@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mif] bare names (was: [dnsext] 2nd Last Call for MIF DNS server selection document)
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:16:10 -0000

On Oct 19, 2011, at 10:44 AM, Keith Moore wrote:
No, I'm saying that there is a need for a naming convention that allows names with local meaning (however the meaning is determined) to be distinguished from DNS names. And longstanding practice is to use single-label names for this.

You mean like "foo.local"?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email