Re: [mif] Decision regarding MIF

Terry Manderson <terry.manderson@icann.org> Tue, 10 May 2016 13:23 UTC

Return-Path: <terry.manderson@icann.org>
X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F8BD12B04A for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 May 2016 06:23:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PvSK2AkCu5us for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 May 2016 06:23:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out.west.pexch112.icann.org (pfe112-ca-2.pexch112.icann.org [64.78.40.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78A2A12B018 for <mif@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 May 2016 06:23:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1130.7; Tue, 10 May 2016 06:23:27 -0700
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ([64.78.40.21]) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG ([64.78.40.21]) with mapi id 15.00.1130.005; Tue, 10 May 2016 06:23:27 -0700
From: Terry Manderson <terry.manderson@icann.org>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Thread-Topic: [mif] Decision regarding MIF
Thread-Index: AQHRqXzoXOA/exeC90K89UcAn90N85+wpgIAgAKiQ4A=
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 13:23:27 +0000
Message-ID: <D3581C64.87B89%terry.manderson@icann.org>
References: <D3560151.876CF%terry.manderson@icann.org> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1605090858430.7599@uplift.swm.pp.se>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1605090858430.7599@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.3.160329
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [192.0.47.234]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="B_3545767405_488486"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mif/pW2kiQLIgT-eFt_zbZUZFVqvKmY>
Cc: "mif@ietf.org" <mif@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mif] Decision regarding MIF
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mif/>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 13:23:31 -0000

Hi Mikael,


On 9/05/2016, 5:10 PM, "Mikael Abrahamsson" <swmike@swm.pp.se>; wrote:

>On Sun, 8 May 2016, Terry Manderson wrote:
>
>> I will be closing the MIF Working Group, however I will be leaving the
>> Mailing List open for ongoing discussion.
>
>Hi,
>
>With the MIF working group closed, where should work in this area be done?
>
>I don't really care where the work is done, as long as it gets done.
>INTAREA?

I doubt there is a one place for everything as some topics do appear to
have strong correlation to existing WGs. However, yes INTAREA would be the
default location for topics not already solidly in play.

That said, I'm very open to talking about what and where on a case by case
basis.

[..]
>
>So while I realise why you've made your decision, this is the one
>question 
>that is still left unanswered for me.

Does this help address that concern?

Cheers
Terry