Re: [mif] Decision regarding MIF

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Mon, 09 May 2016 07:10 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1AF212D1C0 for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 May 2016 00:10:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.297
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.297 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=swm.pp.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8onXJM9ydjMI for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 May 2016 00:10:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD8F012D19B for <mif@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 May 2016 00:10:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 06D2DA4; Mon, 9 May 2016 09:10:08 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1462777809; bh=yj7doI4qrsbLbr4enRFfJcCZH2AkBwJmNGHCPkB2Wns=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=eAm75qVQmf+z/77lgCL23f6RDosnw0e6UCgeFUctOoJjzmZKcKzSk2ab/ssHlCM+x sUZeqMRTG3cKlrNG678IsI5eoHDTtEYzu38j+6+/33HRFPYR3YOJQq/QzWixiwRAF0 wOnEa8yLB6FZIPdlDzPXk2jaXKKEufqlBt+FzSss=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2A83A3; Mon, 9 May 2016 09:10:08 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 09:10:08 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Terry Manderson <terry.manderson@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <D3560151.876CF%terry.manderson@icann.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1605090858430.7599@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <D3560151.876CF%terry.manderson@icann.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mif/pzLbSVk7fmUUEI1zoSrhrdAUAHg>
Cc: "mif@ietf.org" <mif@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mif] Decision regarding MIF
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mif/>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 May 2016 07:10:17 -0000

On Sun, 8 May 2016, Terry Manderson wrote:

> I will be closing the MIF Working Group, however I will be leaving the
> Mailing List open for ongoing discussion.

Hi,

With the MIF working group closed, where should work in this area be done?

I don't really care where the work is done, as long as it gets done. 
INTAREA?

Since we're seeing people show up with solutions and request these to be 
implemented (draft-mccann-dmm-prefixcost for instance), I'd like to see 
this being coordinated somewhere. Or is there no agreement that this 
should be coordinated?

Because I don't think we'll find the best technical architecture overall 
by working groups independently coming up with solutions in the same space 
and then go and request L3 protocol enhancements individually without 
overall coordination. In my view, this would mean that either nothing gets 
done (because 6MAN will say no), or we get too many solutions in the same 
problem space leading to fragmentation and different technologies not 
playing nice with each other.

So while I realise why you've made your decision, this is the one question 
that is still left unanswered for me.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se