[mile] AD review of Implementation draft

[Kathleen Moriarty <[e-mail]>]

Hello,

Thank you for your work on the implementation report, it looks great!
I have some comments, which are mostly nits that should be addressed
before I initiate the IETF last call.  I also need to look into the
links included as informative references as they may not be considered
stable, so I'll get back to you on that as well.

Section 1:

We'll have trouble with http://siis.realmv6.org/implementations/ as a
stable reference, but I'm not sure what to do about that and will get
back to you.

Section 2.3
nit:
s/fro/for/
   Research and Education Networking Information Sharing and Analysis
   Center (REN-ISAC) is a private community of the research and higher
   education members fro sharing

Consider changing from:
   REN-ISAC also recommends to use of the IODEF attachment provided with
   the notification email be processed rather than relying on parsing of
   the email body text.  The interface provided by REN-ISAC are designed
   for dealing with such email.
To:
   REN-ISAC also recommends to use an IODEF attachment provided with
   a notification email for processing rather than relying on parsing of
   the email body text.  The interface provided by REN-ISAC are designed
   to handle such email.

Section 3.1

Probably not necessary to include "Internet Engineering Task Force",
just IETF is enough as it's a well known acronym.

Section 6.2
Is IDMEF expanded anywhere?  What is SNML?

Section 6.3
s/IODEf/IODEF/
and
s/IODef/IODEF/


Thank you!

-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen