Re: [mile] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis-22: (with COMMENT)

"Roman D. Danyliw" <rdd@cert.org> Mon, 20 June 2016 13:55 UTC

From: "Roman D. Danyliw" <rdd@cert.org>
To: "Roman D. Danyliw" <rdd@cert.org>, Alvaro Retana <aretana@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis-22: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHRu4TrH9mJeraDUE+4D0d/zhuma5/WKbZggBxVPCA=
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 13:55:44 +0000
Message-ID: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFCD97667C5@marathon>
References: <20160531212421.20304.86048.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFCD97501F6@marathon>
In-Reply-To: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFCD97501F6@marathon>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mile/1TutY0VcKIJoJgibHQZn1H_Nb3U>
Cc: "mile@ietf.org" <mile@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis@ietf.org>, "mile-chairs@ietf.org" <mile-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mile] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis-22: (with COMMENT)
Precedence: list

Hello Alvaro!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mile [mailto:mile-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Roman D. Danyliw
> Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 9:33 AM
> To: Alvaro Retana <aretana@cisco.com>; The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc: mile@ietf.org; draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis@ietf.org; mile-chairs@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [mile] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-
> bis-22: (with COMMENT)
> 
> Hello Alvaro!
> 
> Thanks for the review.  A response is below ...
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Alvaro Retana [mailto:aretana@cisco.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 5:24 PM
> > To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> > Cc: draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis@ietf.org; mile-chairs@ietf.org;
> > takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp
> > Subject: Alvaro Retana's No Objection on
> > draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis-22: (with
> > COMMENT)
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > COMMENT:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > I am out of my depth here…
> >
> > I noticed that rfc6685 Updated rfc5070, which this document Obsoletes.
> > rfc6685 just "specifies additional expert reviews for IODEF extensions".
> > But a similar consideration was not included in the bis.  Is it not needed?
> 
> Good point.  This was an oversight.  The expert review suggested by rfc6685
> should be added to this draft too.
>
> > Should this document also Obsolete rfc6685?
> 
> Yes, it should.

The new text in -23 reads as follows:

10.3.  Expert Review of IODEF-Related XML Registry Entries

   IODEF class extensions, per Section 5.2, could register their
   namespaces and schemas with the IANA XML Namespace ("ns",
   http://www.iana.org/assignments/xml-registry/xml-registry.xhtml#ns)
   and Schema registries ("schema", http://www.iana.org/assignments/xml-
   registry/xml-registry.xhtml#schema) described in [RFC3688].  In
   addition to any reviews required by IANA, changes to the XML Schema
   registry for schema names beginning with
   "urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:iodef" are subject to an additional IODEF
   Expert Review [RFC5226] to ensure compatibility with IODEF and other
   existing IODEF extensions.

   The IODEF expert(s) for these reviews will be designated by the IETF
   Security Area Directors.

   This document obsoletes [RFC6685].

Thanks again for the feedback,
Roman

Re: [mile] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-… Roman D. Danyliw
Re: [mile] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-… Roman D. Danyliw