Re: [mile] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis-22: (with COMMENT)

On 1 Jun 2016, at 10:04, kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com wrote:

> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Jun 1, 2016, at 9:43 AM, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:
>>
>> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis-22: No Objection
>>
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut 
>> this
>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>>
>>
>> Please refer to 
>> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>>
>>
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis/
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> I concur with Alissa's and Alexey's discuss points.
>>
>> Additionally, I think the rest of the points in Robert Spark's secdir
>> review[1] deserve responses.
>>
>> The shepherd writeup mentions a desire for more XML review. Did that
>> occur? (I note that it also says the XML had been mechanically
>> verified.)
>
> Hi Ben,
>
> I included that in my review and compared it to the UML as well.  I 
> mentioned this in the ballot write up. I believe Take did this too as 
> he caught an error last night.

Yes, you did. Thanks for reminding me to carefully read the ballot write 
ups :-)

(In my defense, I reviewed this on an airplane with only intermittent 
network access.)

>
> Thanks for your review!
> Kathleen
>>
>> [1]
>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mile/0Io60Sdn--hRzQWN3Q0keCYIA1w
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mile mailing list
>> mile@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mile